ACC & BE should've merged after 2003

Instead of John Swofford methodically picking off Big East programs 1 & 2 at a time - Miami & Va Tech in '04, BC in '05, Cuse & Pitt in '13 & Notre Dame in '14 (or something) ... Swofford should have bee proactive & absorbed the entire BE football conference into the ACC ranks. If his dream was to create a true Atlantic Coast Conference from Cuba to Canada, he had the opportunity but he was too chicken to make it happen.

Big East football played it's first "real" 7 game schedule in 1993 (we all know a real conference plays 8 games) so that's 11 seasons of existence before Swofford swooped in and vultured off their football teams. There obviously would have been a lot of media backlash & negative attention back in 2003 but it would've been pretty painless because every BE team (save Temple, sorry Owls) would've been able to join the ACC. All 7 of them. And Swofford wouldn't have been blamed for killing the BE because the BE is a private, Catholic basketball league from 1979 that added football in the 90s to make more money.

BE Basketball in 2003 = Providence, St. John's, Seton Hall, Villanova, Georgetown, Notre Dame then they added DePaul & Marquette for 2005. They had 14 teams total in 2003 w/ the 8 football schools. So absorb as many Atlantic-10 Catholic schools as you want.

Big East football in 2003:

Boston College, Syracuse, Rutgers, Temple, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, Miami (UConn jumped up from FCS in '04, partly because they wanted to but mostly of Swofford's raid)

BC, Cuse, Pitt, Va Tech & Miami ended up joining the ACC eventually anyway. Now that the B1G stole Maryland & the ACC has to choose between UConn & Louisville, retrospect shows West Va would've been a good addition despite academics. Rutgers fits despite being not fitting Swofford's basketball school mold.

Super ACC w/ 16 teams in 2004:

NORTH pod: Boston College, Syracuse, Rutgers, Pittsburgh

ATLANTIC pod: Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, Virginia Tech

COASTAL pod: North Carolina, North Carolina State, Duke, Wake Forest

SOUTH pod: Clemson, Georgia Tech, Florida State, Miami

A proactive move like that by Swofford could have gotten the wheels in his head turning & come up with some ideas like creating ACCtv for Tiers 2 & 3 & leveraging the new markets in South Florida, Pittsburgh, NYC & New England to getting a respectable TV contract for Tier 1. ACCtv would've required giving our rights up & by 2012 the network would've been generating enough revenue, Maryland & Rutgers wouldn't need to play Iowa & Nebraska to afford their sports teams.

Looking back at the old landscape of football conferences back in '03, the SEC & Big XII were at 12. PAC-10 was at 10 and could add Utah & BYU to reach 12. Losing a lot of the reasons why ND liked it's BE membership, might've made them the Big Ten's 12 team or the B1G would've kept waiting for them at 11. So the 5 Power conferences would all be at 12 w/ the ACC/BE at 16.

So 3 moves to end conference realignment among the BCS conferences - BE's 7 join ACC's 9 = 16, Notre Dame joins BIG = 12, Utah & BYU join PAC-10 = 12. SEC & XII arealdy have 12. Everyone's happy.

These opinions are not necessarily those of the Proprietors of Shakin' The Southland.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Shakin The Southland

You must be a member of Shakin The Southland to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Shakin The Southland. You should read them.

Join Shakin The Southland

You must be a member of Shakin The Southland to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Shakin The Southland. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.