Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Charmin Tigers Struggle to Defeat Wofford

The Master of Strategerie, Dabo Swinney, had a plan for today. 1). Rock the camo, because we're fucking hardcore like that. 2). He decided to let Tribble Reese lead the Tiger Walk with his ladies so he could make us a joke on a sitcom as well as on the football field. 3). Call a fake FG to demonstrate his genius. Somehow the domination by Wofford will look less embarassing, at least thats the plan.

After that it was just a shitshow. Wofford shouldn't be anywhere close to Clemson at the end of the game. Clemson has more athletic ability at every position. There is one thing that is noticably different about Wofford, and that is that they aint SOFT. They dont have great players but they are coached well and they were prepared to play this game. Clemson was not.

Again we saw the Charmin Ultra Soft Tigers unable to move anyone up front on inside running plays. Again an opponent showed us delayed Fire Zone blitzes and we could not pick them up. Again we could not tackle in the open field. Nothing pisses me off like seeing problems that don't get improved or corrected. We chalked some of this up to jitters and youth on the field last week, but that excuse is over. We played starters for most of this game. This has to get fixed right now, or else we'll be 2-3 very fast.

What do you think Gene Chizik and Ted Roof are going to be thinking Monday when they look at film of our protections in 2 games? To borrow a line from a friend, they're going to be watching it with Jergens and Kleenex. Bud Foster will fall off his chair laughing when he sees our new Matador, Antoine McClain, just letting guys go untouched to the QB because he CANT MOVE HIS FUCKING FEET. McClain does not belong on the football field right now, there is no person up front who fucks up his assignment more often, there is no person who forgets that blocking requires you to MOVE YOUR ASS quite like him. Mason Cloy should be starting RG, or put a freshman in there. I'd rather watch the freshman miss his assignment and grow with him than see a Senior who has consistently screwed up the most of all 5 linemen continue to play and whiff. But Dabo wont do that because Dabo loves his Bama boys.

As for the pass protection issues in general, the blame still gets spread around. Both Troy and Wofford are using Fire Zones, which are nothing more than overload blitzes from one side with zone behind them, and we are not using the right protections to handle them. This job is the QB's job. The QB must read blitz and check the protection so he has time to throw it. He has to let the RB know that he must stay in to block when they send more on one side than you can block. Going from memory, the two consecutive sacks from the L/R side, which were delay blitzes up the B-gap, were because of this. Both the G and T were engaged and the C had gone to the other side, and they sent a LB on a delay blitz. You cannot put those on the OL. The best way to handle that is a draw play or hit the hot route, or change your protection to keep the back in.

I feel like the protection will get better, but if the inside run blocking does not, then this will sink the offense. We have enough athletes to score points, but if you cannot run the ball inside in an offense that is based off power running inside, then you really won't be able to do anything consistently. Thats not the plays, not the calls, its not the QB, its David Smith, Dalton Freeman, and Antoine McClain. We run simpler schemes up front now. Wofford played mostly a 3-man base front and we couldn't exploit either bubble in that front. That is pathetic.

Tajh's decision making was fine, and his completion percentage was again good enough. He shares blame in his sacks, and he has to be more effective as a runner in this offense to make them play back. The TD scramble was nice, but he needs to do it just a few times more per game. I didn't see him force but one ball late on a slant that should've been picked. It appeared to me that Morris took away some of his reads in the run game, as we ran read option-type plays (IV, ZR) fewer in this game. Perhaps this was a simplification for him in practice this week.

Defensively, tackling, tackling, tackling, tackling. We did not tackle in the open field better. We did not play with our EYES any better. When someone runs option against you, you have a job to do. One man has QB first, so you hit the mufugher on every play no matter what. One man has the pitch back. Everybody inside has the Dive. Well we couldn't get them down on the ground at all because we can't tackle, and we weren't in position to get them tackled because we weren't LOOKING for the ball. We lost edge containment so many times that I was about to have a stroke watching this garbage. All the perimeter play, mostly by Linebackers and support, really mucked up a great performance by Brandon Thompson. Wofford had no answer for him. Their Center was swatted aside like a rag doll from the 2nd quarter forward. Branch played his assignment well enough, but I was not happy with anyone else on the edge or on the 2nd level in the middle.

Inability to stick with assignments shows lack of discipline, and since this game had our starters on defense in there late, I'm quite worried about them going forward. Yes, we stopped Wofford in the 2nd half better, but they should not have been able to convert on 3rd downs either.

This weekend's film review will be FUN FUN.

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Perfect analysis

Offensivly Boyd simply needs to read blitz better which he will unfortuantly have plenty of time to do this year with this O-Line and that very O-line is playing horribly! The one big question mark comign in this year with this line was Price but he’s playing better than any of the other starters! It makes no sense and I must call for Caldwell to either step up and prove that the hype about him was well deserved.

Defensivly, we simply lack the same efficent intensity that we had the past few years. Branch, Thompson and Moore, at time at least, show that they are good players but more than naything I blame Steele for this. He has seen the triple option more than most especially since GT carved us up with it all 2009 and yet he still is unable to drill into the players’ heads the assignments they are supposed to have and follow through with it? If the 1st string can’t get it done then send in the freshmen, they’ve proved that they can outplay the starters at times, at least Anthony has, but I don’t remember seeing them almost any freshmen LB play. Is it really that difficult to slow our D down and make sure that they stick to their assignments?

All in all, we won, but it was a nasty, dirty win. However, I think we need these kinds of wins. Nothing shows you who going to step up and who breaks under rpessure more so then being put down at the begining of the game, barely tying a weaker team at half time, and getting your butt kicked by an offensive scheme that we shoule probably be able to run in our SLEEP! I’m calling for a overhaul on our defense this week in practice. I don’t care if they are the starters, if they aren’t practicing embaressed and angered, like Branch and Thompson were, then I don’t want them on the field. I want players that have pride and that get mad when they realize that a loser is on THEIR field and acting like they are going t win the game!

by D'Arve21 on Sep 10, 2011 10:05 PM EDT reply actions  

we were spoiled the last few years when we had NFL talent all along the DLine

BT played well today but he was about the only one. Overall, the defensive starters are not as talented as the last 2 years. Steele runs a complex defense and the rookies have a pretty steep learning curve. It has been well-documented before the season started to expect this team to give up some points. I do not think anyone thought the D would be giving up 400+ yards to the first 2 opponents though.

by TigerEast on Sep 10, 2011 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well that's STeele's problem. This is college, you're always going to have a large influx

of young players every couple of years. If his defense is so complex that you have to be in the system 3 or 4 years to learn it and play it perfectly, then he needs to go. You’re never going to reach that perfect scenario where you have 11 seniors out there with 4 yrs experience in the system. If thats his excuse for that piss poor performance, thats bullshit.

The defense has not been as good under him as it was under Vic K. Last year the defense was pretty solid but they had 6 NFL guys on it. For Christ’s sake is that what it takes to have a solid defense under him, an all-NFL defense? Heck give me 11 NFL players and I could coach defense. I think Nick Saban was glad to see Steele go. His defense improved immediately the following season. We hired the wrong co-DC from Alabama’s staff.

Heck, I’d have rather had Chavis than Steele. I know Chavis is an un-popular guy on here and you guys crack on his “Mustang” defense but all he does is get results. The defense was great when he was at UT, and its still great while he’s at LSU. Dont tell me, well “he’s got all that talent” because we have amazing talent too. We bring in class after class of 3, 4, 5 star recruits. We have talent too and we’re giving up over 400 yds per game to Troy and Wofford? That’s some serious crap defense.

by IhateUSuC on Sep 11, 2011 5:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know you despise Swinney

But if the OL is so crappy, and can’t move anyone inside, why isn’t any of this fury leveled on Caldwell? You didn’t spare Brad Scott any wrath, but Caldwell’s name is not even in the tirade. He’s supposed to be one of the best OL coaches out there, remember? All Swinney did was go hire him to do the job.

If the OL sucks, then blame goes to the OL coach. Period.

by Cristo on Sep 10, 2011 10:33 PM EDT reply actions  

If the OL sucks the blame goes to the entire offensive staff, and the S&C coach

like I said last week.

But I dont call for Caldwells head because I dont think Caldwell is the problem. Only one coach gets 24/7/365 access to develop toughness and that man is Joey Batson.

by DrB on Sep 10, 2011 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it's only fair...

To re-iterate that last year with this same performance it would have been half-Batson and half-Scott rant and do you really develop football toughness in a weight room? I tend to think of it as an attitude and not a muscle group.

Two other thoughts:
1. Does anyone else feel that Andre is playing less well this year or would you attribute it purely to the O-Line…he seems to be hitting the hole, when there is one, with less authority and speed.
2. Our O hasn’t been the problem as much as our D has, but we knew that our D would take time to grow. Our Offense has looked ugly, but they’ve gotten points on the board.

Eat shit and die carolina!

by T_Tig on Sep 10, 2011 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Differences

Scott recruited them, Scott developed them into Cottonelle. Caldwell has had hands-on coaching with them for only 2 weeks in Spring, and about 6 this fall. He can’t work with them enough to undo anything technical.

However I do not think its technical. I think its mental and the only way to develop mental toughness is a year-round effort to keep it at a certain level. Caldwell nor Scott can do that as field coaches, because they dont have access. They can set a tone in August but I doubt Caldwell can clean up Brad’s problems in 2 games. Batson can, him and Greenlee both have the access.

We werent exactly hardcore with Ron West running the line pre 06 either.

I think Andre has been a little tentative as a runner, and maybe he’s not in the condition he was last year because of the surgery and healing time, but that he’ll be fine. Theres no structural damage to a knee or muscle that would really kill his speed.

by DrB on Sep 10, 2011 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Case in point, quote from Landon Walker
" They’re a great team. They won their conference. We still had almost 500 yards. Had we scored a couple of field goals, we’d have had over 40 points."

They battled with PC last week.

That sounds like it came from Bowdens mouth its so bad.

by DrB on Sep 10, 2011 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could see it now...

“Yeah, they are a high school team, but they won the state championship last year.” Clemson offensive linemen state after winning a close game against Byrnes High School.

by abmtigers on Sep 11, 2011 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

to be fair

I’ve heard the game wouldn’t have been nearly as close with PC if it weren’t for 3 phantom personal fouls.

I’m still embarrassed and agree with your analysis, but I don’t think Wofford is quite as bad as all that.

by PenthouseTiger on Sep 11, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to open up the S & C debate again but they tout Shatley as the strongest guy on the team.

They do so because he can press 225 the most reps on the team. He was spotlighted on the broadcast when the announcers were talking him, and I have to admit his build was not what I would have expected for someone labeled as the strongest on the team. I know you do not have look strong to be strong, but the bigger point is why he is labeled the strongest and that is the benchpress mentality.

What difference does it make how many times a player can press a weight if the player can not hold his position?

by TigerEast on Sep 10, 2011 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you want to call someone out

how about Pearman. He is the Special Teams coach. That unit totally sucked ass today and had miscues last week.

The fake punt was most likely Wofford picking up on film study the unit just turning around to block instead of ensuring the punter does kick it away. Wofford almost broke 2 long KO returns. 2 botched PATs so far.

What exactly has Pearman contributed to this staff since he came on board? Seems his accomplishments have been pretty unremarkable.

by TigerEast on Sep 10, 2011 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

WOW…them’s fightin’ words! Jack Hines was a very, very bad coach so I pray that Pearman’s responsibilities get better because we are in a world of hurt if there is a Jack Hines-like coach on this staff!!

by FIGUREFOUR on Sep 11, 2011 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

We really don't despise anyone

but are sick of seeing the same bullshit week in and out. Caldwell has been here for less than 9 months. It takes more than that to clean up the shitstorm left by his predecessors.

None of the schools he coached at before bitched and moaned about him…there are boatloads of FSU fans who will tell you that Brad Scott was a joke there before he was a joke at Carolina then pissed us off here at Clemson.

by FIGUREFOUR on Sep 11, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Walker basically says in the free article at TI

that the OL is aware that everyone says they are a soft unit, but wait til the end of the year before judging them too harshly. Some how I doubt there are going to be any fundamental changes in the next 2 months to create a tough, physical OLine that has been missing for the better part of 20 years.

Freeman says the odd fronts have been confusing, and they have not prepared well enough to offset these schemes. Walker says they prepared for something totally different than what Wofford employed. It shouldn’t have mattered when they are playing a team that barely beat Presbyterian last week. Wofford should hit on a few plays if they are going against their tendencies, but they are physically, athletically, and numbers inferior.

Four quarter game my ass. Talk that bullshit all you want Swinney, Boyd, etc. but the team performance today was an embarrassment even though we did not lose. The fake field goal attempt just totally exposes what kind of program Clemson currently has. CU was so inept and incompetent that Swinney relented to attempted trickery to put away a mighty school of less than 2000 students.

Swinney proclaimed before the start of the year he was a better coach than in years passed. That attempted fake field goal and/or the necessity to attempt to resorting to trickery to beat a team like Wofford exposes the fact that he is not a better coach. He is just less of a cheerleader.

by TigerEast on Sep 10, 2011 10:40 PM EDT reply actions  

The stuff about Odd fronts is a bullshit excuse.

They’ve faced 1000 odd fronts as starters here. Price is the one that can use that and get away with it.

by DrB on Sep 10, 2011 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was not a very inspiring effort.

We may be 2-0, but it has not been pretty. Can’t believe we could not convert 4th and 1 against Wofford. That’s just sad.

"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony

by Tigerplowboy on Sep 10, 2011 10:56 PM EDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Love listening to Chad

speak after the game. He said it. It is a mental issue. It’s all in the head. It doesn’t matter how much talent you have if you’re not mentally tough you fail. Our O-Line is not mentally tough. In fact most of our team is not mentally tough. To me the younger players, Watkins, Bellamy, Nuke, Brown, Anthony are the mentally tougher players. It’s sickening when the seniors can’t out perform the young players from a purly mental standpoint

by D'Arve21 on Sep 10, 2011 11:03 PM EDT reply actions  

I think mental toughness is a product of confidence.

Its just like putting in golf. You have to see some go in before you are confident in your stroke. I fail to see how this unit will ever be mentally tough after they sit through film study and see themselves getting whipped by slower, smaller guys. It only takes one fuck upMcClainplayer not performing to affect the entire line’s performance.

by TigerEast on Sep 10, 2011 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who in the hell is Landon Walker fooling?

"It wasn’t necessarily guys getting beat one-on-one. It’s was just miscommunication," said Clemson tackle Landon Walker. "If they played us one-on-one all day, they couldn’t hang. That’s just common sense. It’s Wofford and Clemson. They don’t have the athletes to match up, so they do a lot of different things defensively strategically to throw us off. That’s what they did with blitzing linebackers.

"It’s was more of a chess game in the first half. We didn’t have the right answer for what they were doing. We came in at halftime, made the adjustments and got it fixed."

In the second half, Clemson averaged 3.8 yards per carry, went 4-for-7 on third down and allowed only one sack.

How is 3.8 yards per carry “getting it fixed”?? Didn’t he have some BS last year about how his side of the line was essentially kicking major ass? We do not have a physical OL, period.

by judge jeff davis on Sep 10, 2011 11:48 PM EDT reply actions  

This game was a joke

Everyone here knows it. Guys, start getting used to this shit now, we will be 2-3 3 games from now. We are going down, and going down hard. Maybe this new staff can pay off in a couple of years, but Dabo doesn’t have that, and we are gonna fall flat on our faces HARD over the next few games. These games were decided in recruiting 3-4 years ago and in spring camp this year, and we just don’t have it. Forget any return to glory anytime soon. Auburn, FSU, and VaTech already beat us, and they did it 2-3 years ago.

by tripp1 on Sep 11, 2011 1:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Not willing to go that far

The fact remains that we still have the talent and ability to go toe to toe with every team we play. The problem is that we’re underacheving, and that is what is so frustrating to fans. I still see enough good things from QB play, WR corp and RBs to at least give us a chance at a shoot out with all the teams we have left. Defense took a big step back from last year but once again the talent is there. Now the issue is can Steele and the other coaches bring it together and get the FUNDAMENTALS down.

by D'Arve21 on Sep 11, 2011 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

2-3?? Clemson will be 4-8 at the end of the year. Carolina will put a beating on

them, that will make 63-17 look like a close game.

This team is attrocious. I dont care what kind of gimmicky offense or “complex NFL defense” they run, football comes down to blocking and tackling and this team cannot do either.

Its going to be a long long season. Unless they can magically flip a switch and get better this week, Auburn is going to whip their asses.

by IhateUSuC on Sep 11, 2011 4:49 AM EDT reply actions  

"Well we didn't block anybody but we made up for it by not tackling anybody"

Yeah, we’re Tampa Bay Buccaneers bad. As in, the creamsicle uniform days bad.

by mdlusk on Sep 11, 2011 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Talent level- not sure it's there

Im starting to think it’s not there anymore. We’ve masked decencies up front on O with fast guys running around at the skill sets.. On D a NFL line and a continuously solid secondary masked a weak LB Corp. Now the speed on O is young, and the secondary and dline are regrouping right along with the LBs. I still think we’ll squeeze out 7 wins.

"Well Mr. Accountant, everytime you move that pencil does someone hit you in the mouth?" - Robbie Caldwell

by scgreatest803 on Sep 11, 2011 8:57 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Thoughts

1 – The D is replacing 5 guys who are now on NFL Rosters. We’re in the middle of the learning curve
2 – The sweatshirt is loyal to a fault with nonperforming players – lest i remind you of the PT that Clear, Ashe, and Dye got and the fact that AE was splitting carries 50-50 with a guy who was averaging 2 yds a carry. McClain needs to sit his lazy fat ass on the bench.
3 – We’re talking about 18-19 year old kids who have seen Aub, FSU, and VT on the schedule for months now. It’s human nature to look past the first 2. My only prayer is that the fundamentals that have been lacking for 2 games were mostly due to lack of focus and not due to some inherent laziness.

by sedge94 on Sep 11, 2011 9:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Pathetic

We have continued to listen to our head coach’s bullshit for over a decade now, would it surprise anyone if Dabo pulls out “Ohio State struggled with Toledo” on Tuesday? Dabo has become exactly who he replaced. During his “tryout” he said all the right things and was the anit-bowden. He then road the coattails of CJ and company to an ACC championship appearance. The simple fact that he let TRIBBLE REESE (that shit is still pissing me off) lead Tiger Walk, proves he is so out of touch with the fan base. It is disgusting to watch and we are getting exactly what we deserve for letting TDP make this hire.

The only thing Dabo brings to the table is the ability to recruit. That however doesnt amount to jack shit if you can’t develop the talent once you get them on campus. Besides Jacoby Ford and Aaron Kelly who has left Clemson extremely improved from the time he stepped foot on campus. I am sure I am missing a couple that came into their own while at Clemson, but I doubt you can argue that we do NOT develop talent. This falls on the coaching and the S&C. Hell I would fire Batson just because he has been the one common denominator throughout this decade of bullshit.

by abmtigers on Sep 11, 2011 9:12 AM EDT reply actions  

No longer on the bandwagon

I will always pull for Clemson regardless of the coach, and I have no problem with Dabo the man – hell, I don’t even know him, so I certainly can’t have an opinion on him as a person. But I’m tired of him as a coach. He fails to field a FUNDAMENTALLY SOUND football team year-in, year-out. The only reason we went to the ACC championship game in 2009 was because CJ and Jacoby were ridiculous playmakers and we play in a sorry ass conference. The inability to punch Wofford in the mouth yesterday put me firmly on the blow it up and start over before we fall any further. I still feel like this is a program that would rather get a Sportscenter highlight than catch the ball away from your pads, or keep your feet moving, or play to the whistle. I don’t care if Wofford had won the past 10 FCS titles, there is no way, no how they should play with Clemson. The sad thing was, we were playing WITH THEM. That was a really, really tight game – it’s not like we were just loafing or asleep; they could have won. If that had been a flag football game Clemson would have dominated…unfortunately this is real, big boy football and we’ve just gotten physically beaten (or at least matched) by Troy and Wofford. “Enter Sandman” is the perfect anthem for what Virginia Tech is going to do to us….I have a feeling there will be several of our players ‘exiting the light’ in that one.

by judge jeff davis on Sep 11, 2011 9:45 AM EDT reply actions  

I know we arent into sunshine pumping, but does that mean we have to go the opposite?

obviously not what we want from the 0-line or the defense, but you know that these guys have got to be looking ahead to this three week stretch. I am excited to see us line up against AU. Sammy Watkins is a really good player, and I am really excited to see him keep developing. Apart from game management, Tajh seems to be getting better. Hopefully they coach them up this weekend and the guys come in pumped. I still feel pretty confident in our chances next weekend.

by Beau Creson on Sep 11, 2011 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Do you wanna people to congratulate the team on squeaking out a victory over Wofford? Is that the level we’ve stooped to?

I’m sorry, but I don’t care if the players were looking past Wofford or not. We should be able to be them by 5 TDs regardless. An average GT team beat them by 40.

by ggggmen08 on Sep 11, 2011 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dabo and the military pants

I think we need to ease off Dabo and the assistants for wearing the military pants at the Wofford game. As a Clemson cadet for 4 years and current military personnel I have no problem with them wearing the military pants nor do I think it was inappropriate/unprofessional. I for one enjoy the enthusiasm that Dabo has brought to the military appreciation day game and think that the coaches choice of sideline apparel only helps to shine a positive light on the event.

 As for the coaching and current level of our football team you are right on the money. Dabo has not prepared this team to be able to handle two weak opening game opponents and has left us in a terrible position heading into the toughest stretch of the season. If Wofford’s running game gave us this much trouble Michael Dyer is going to have a blast on Saturday.

by CUTGR4LIFE on Sep 11, 2011 9:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation site about the Clemson Tigers. If you want to take a hard look at both sides of something, feel free to stick around and comment. Be forewarned, we don't pump sunshine here.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Thisone_small
TDP Interview
Img2_small
Clemson Expansion: Big Picture
Small
2012 RULE CHANGES = THE WUSSIFICATION OF FOOTBALL
Clem_brawl-736603_small
Bellamy
Clem_brawl-736603_small
The state of Clemson Football (long)
Small
First hand (sort of) experience with Batson's system
Small
Somebody gets it
Small
Clemson Basketball Recruiting Chart
Angels_small
Brownell & Kansas State
Collegecampus_small
Frank Martin to coach USC Basketball

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Bengal Tiger

Danny_ford_small DrB

Slick_small FIGUREFOUR

Persian Tiger

Tyree_helmet_catch_small ggggmen08

Small QuackingTiger

Sumatran Tiger

Sma_20clemson-tiger-w_20_2__small redbricktiger

Ellington_small Peter_G

Cj_spiller_heisman_small F1NS

Clemson-tigers-fans_the_wave_small SJTill