Linebacker Recruiting Analysis: Clemson vs. ACC Coastal 2006 to Present

Today, we compare Clemson's linebacker recruiting endeavors to ACC Coastal foes.  Assumptions made in creating this article can be found here.  I should point out that we strictly used www.scout.com position classifications.  It is possible that some players ended up at a different position ball after they arrived on campus for any of the schools in this article.

Table I and Figure 1 (below) both illustrate Clemson's ranking based on LB class size since 2006.  Clemson (at 2.67 players per class) recruited fewer linebackers than everyone except Virginia Tech and was tied for second fewest with Duke.  North Carolina, the division's leader at 3.67 players per class, brought in one full linebacker more than Clemson on average each year.  Overall, the average ACC Coastal football program brought in over 1/3 a lineman (3.13 per class) more than Clemson did from 2006-present.

Notable items in this category are North Carolina's consistency (bringing in three or four linebackers per class each year), Miami's huge 2008 class of nine (9) LB's followed by large classes in 2010/2011 (nine total players in the combined classes), Georgia Tech's commitment to numbers, and Clemson's nine total linebackers over the past two classes.  Even with Clemson's large '10 and '11 classes, the Tigers have brought in grossly fewer numbers at this position than the guys in the Coastal..

Table I:  Recruiting Class Size

Players_signed_table_clem_vs_acc_coastal_medium 
Players_signed_individual_team_graph_clem_vs_acc_coastal_medium
Figure 1:  Individual Institution Recruiting Class Size

Players_signed_graph_clem_vs_acc_coastal_medium
Figure 2:  Average non-Clemson vs Clemson Recruiting Class Size

 

Table II and Figure 3 show the average star-rating per player for each team, as shown below.  Clemson (3.12 stars/player) trailed Miami (3.18 stars per player) and North Carolina (3.19 stars per player) in average star-rating.  Clemson outperformed the others in this category.  Duke anchored this group with a 2.31 star per player average.  Clemson was able to beat the Coastal average by over a quarter of a star per player. 

Table II:  Average Player Star Rating per Team

Players_star_rating_table_clem_vs_acc_coastal_medium 
Players_star_rating_individual_team_graph_clem_vs_acc_coastal_medium
Figure 3:  Individual Team Average Player Star Rating per Class

Players_star_rating_graph_clem_vs_acc_coastal_medium
Figure 4:  Average non-Clemson vs Clemson Recruiting Class Average Player Star Rating 

Again, Clemson was overall average when compared to other ACC Coastal teams over the time period examined.  Clemson used very nice 2010 and 2011 classes to keep it respectable.  Clemson still, on the whole, was outrecruited by North Carolina and Miami in both metrics examined here.  Those two teams, along with FSU in the Atlantic, really showed out pulling backers from '06 to present.

While we are definitely excited about the Freshman and Sophomore LB's, we would like to see Clemson maintain higher signing numbers moving forward and really want to see the three year rolling average from class to class remain at or above three linebackers per class.

In This Article

Teams
X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Shakin The Southland

You must be a member of Shakin The Southland to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Shakin The Southland. You should read them.

Join Shakin The Southland

You must be a member of Shakin The Southland to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Shakin The Southland. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker