Moving through Spring Practice...
You all are probably aware of the football related concerns I have moving forward (and touched on here). I want share some additional thoughts as we get into the meat of Spring Practice. Chad Morris' offensive philosophy still initiates questions about short yardage situations and whether we have all the pieces to implement his vision. I do, however, like several core aspects of his offensive philosophy, particularly after seeing footage and hearing news from folks who were on hand to see it in person.
Morris' Offensive Scheme
Morris wants to run 85 plays a football game. To prepare, he wants approx. 10 seconds between plays during practice scrimmage sessions. This strategy does a couple of things. First, it raises the tempo of practice sessions. We're all for raising the difficulty level of practices here. Second, it causes the offensive players to process information quickly and execute equally as quickly.
The increased practice tempo should improve conditioning. It should also improve practice organization as the staff will need to script a large portion of each practice period and maintain schedule to meet aforementioned goals. Morris' strategy also requires better preparation by the players and support coaches to keep up with the pace. It will place more emphasis on teaching fundamentals through individual group periods. I would say this could make our practices less physical, but I don't see how our practices could get any less physical than in years past.
Morris uses a series of cards to flash in formations/plays, as does Malzahn. Dabo will not be signaling plays any longer. The players should already be at or near their position(s) when they get the signals from the sidelines. They immediately get set/motion/realign as needed so that the ball can be snapped quickly. This requires the players to receive, process, and implement lots of information in a little amount of time. Morris adjusts for this information overload by running a relatively simple offense that employs a handful of core plays. The beauty of this whole scheme from a practice to implementation point of view is shown through two basic concepts: players practice a core group of plays and these plays are engrained into the athletes through repetition. Thus, the offense will be more demanding in terms of total plays but each player should have a better grasp on the plays. Here is how I envision improvement occurring:
Morris' Attention to Detail
This area is one of the most appealing attributes of Chad Morris. We discussed how disciplined his players were at Tulsa when he took the job in January. We also complained throughout the year about accuracy issues and technical flaws at the QB position. We commented upon his arrival that Morris' Tulsa offense displayed good fundamental discipline and he appears to be more focused on this than his predecessor. This makes us authors (more) pleased and we hope to see the fruits of this in the fall
"I think he has a chance to be really good," Morris said. "He has a great arm, he has a great release. We are going to get his footwork where I want it. I'm just a technique freak, that's just me. It'll get there." (Chad Morris on Tajh Boyd and fundamentals in general-LINK)
We do think Tajh has an issue with lowering his arm in live situations on release that needs to be worked on as well. Notice whether his throws sail on him. Footwork (understriding specifically) is a factor in this as well.
Swinney and the Media
We touched on Swinney's new media strategy already. I really don't care what he does with the media but hope that he realizes less access could increase criticism. I will say that Swinney needs to evaluate his discussion of the fans with the media. The man is a football coach and will be viewed by the public first and foremost in terms of wins and losses. A coach should not be lecturing the fanbase because of something written on a message board or a call to local talk radio. Swinney should know this better than anyone, being from Alabama. Forks in Bammer live and die for the Tide but show no mercy on their head football coaches (ask Bill Curry)-they just want to win. I think Clemson, as a whole, is much more tolerant than many other schools out there but are critical because Dabo was a Tom Bowden holdover.
DeAndre Hopkins' Basketball Career
I never was a real big fan of DeAndre Hopkins joining the basketball team and continue to question this decision. I am not dogging Hopkins, as he was the best in-state high school b-ball player a year ago and he is competing against great athletes who have been training year-round specifically for basketball season. I understood the logic behind trying to get him on the hardwood, especially with Clemson's depth woes. Still, he has not significantly impacted this team during games (cannot comment on practice). We were excited about him devoting his football offseason to film study and football specific strength and conditioning. Nuke is already football star who we think could go a long, long way with more offseason football preparation. He had a concussion in practice last week, hopefully this will not impede his development.
Defensive Departures
We'll be watching to see how key defensive departures affect this defense. Clemson has a lot to replace up front and in the secondary. We're also interested in the development of the linebackers. Maye's departure will have an impact but probably not as much as most fear. We also have a group of studs coming in this summer. Steele's scheme, however, can be confusing for the linebackers. Our linebackers did improve in 2010, now we need the veterans to fully understand the system for on-field productivity and to assist the newcomers this summer and throughout the fall. As of now, Steele is giving the most praise to Quan Christian and Tig Willard, two guys we projected would take the lead at LB in our recent position review.
Justin Parker's Redshirt (actually, his non-redshirt)
On the topic of linebackers, what is the deal with Justin Parker? We brushed this topic during the season but "Why in the hell was Parker not redshirted?" Clemson effectively pissed away a year of his eligibility (56 snaps) for reasons that are beyond me. Maybe they anticipated him playing more and it never happened, but there is no excuse for such poor player eligibility management. Either play him and play him significantly or drop a redshirt on him so that he can use the season as a learning experience-scout team/individual group work-and still have four years of playing eligibility. This is on the coaches and their assessment of his "readiness" to play at the collegiate level. At least the word from practice is that he has improved some, and supposedly laid out Chad Diehl.
Spring Practice in General
As we repeatedly warn you, don't take too much from Spring Practice and what the coaches report from these practices. Nonetheless, we will be watching the new position coaches to get a feel how they will coach their players. Spring is a time for teaching/learning, so that is the extent of our expectations. We are really excited about Coach Caldwell, so expect us to pay close attention to his efforts to transform the OL into a fundamentally sound group.
They're pimpin Phillip Price hard right now....are we walking into a Xavier Dye/Terrance Ashe/starting5weeksandsuckinghard situation?
The Importance of the Off-Season
We have seen a revolution in the methods athletes use to prepare for sports. In years past, an athlete generally played football in the fall, basketball in the winter, and baseball/track in the spring. This was once applicable in the professional ranks, common in college, and the norm in high school. Now the competition level has increased so much that most athletes simply focus on one sport year-round to maintain a high level of excellence and to simply keep up with their peers. At the prep level, basketball now has summer leagues and AAU, baseball has summer travel teams/fall leagues, and track indoor/outdoor seasons. Football is too violent for extra competition but the players now train year-round and participate in Spring drills.
We feel that this training for the gridiron is necessary to keep up with the competition. We are also advocates of daily film study in addition to mat drills, weight room, and conditioning exercises. Being a stud individual athlete is great, but not necessarily enough to ensure team success. Being an exceptional athlete who understands the game and how the team's scheme works is optimal and necessary in today's competitive world. We have heard reports praising many members of the CU football team's desire to watch film and improve their understanding of Clemson's scheme.
Now for something cool....
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This sideline video
Is pretty cool. If only the music wasn’t included and you could actually hear what was going on. Good find.
Don't give up, don't ever give up ~ Jim Valvano
Linebackers
I’m hoping Christian continues to develop into the talent that most thinks he can be, I have high hopes for the guy..
I know Steele’s defense is complex, and you mentioned not to take coaches comments from the spring too seriously, but he referenced in an interview how Donta Hightower and Rolondo McClain started as freshmen at Bama in his D..I know neither Anthony or Steward will likely start out of the gate, but we need better Mike LB play and I don’t think Corico is the answer..
Encouraging
The thing I really like about this offense is the way that it dictates how we practice. More recently, there’s been some research to show that it is actually more effective to practice for shorter time periods at a higher intensity because it more effectively simulates game conditions. How you practice really dictates how you play very closely, plus you give the players the incentive of getting an extra half hour back every day. A lot of parents who are worried about the fitness of their children put them into organized sports, not realizing that the way many non-professional or high school coaches run practice is to have the kids just stand around for a large portion of the time. Players need to be as active as possible during practice.
But here’s another question: How will this new offense improve our 2 minute drill? As far back as I can remember(earliest days of Tom Bowden) I’ve never felt great about our ability to score at the end of the half or the game. Occasionally we’ve been OK but a lot of the time it was just clear we didn’t know what to do in that situation. North Carolina last year was a particular example of a total clusterfuck in a close game situation. I have to think that running a really fast offense (not just no-huddle with on-field playcalling and adjustments) will help us out in these situations.
And one final question: How will this faster pace really effect our ability to win? I think even if the offense is moderately successful we’re going to see an uptick in the number of points we score every game, which will be given virtually no context in terms of tempo-based stats by anyone in the mainstream media. Every time we score a quick TD, we are still giving the ball back to the other team, so its not likely that we’re going to suddenly get many more possessions or plays than other teams with good offenses. Some of the advantage of the faster system will go back to our ability to turn what, in the past, would not have been enough time to run an effective possession (seconds before clock expires at half or end of game) into effective possessions, thus increasing the number of possessions we have when compared to our opponents.
These are some of the important theories behind why you run an up-tempo offense, but will Morris actually be able to make this happen? What sort of things will determine whether the offense is implemented successfully?
Total amount of gametime where youre actually playing is about 7 minutes.
out of 3 hours of total time. Think about it, 5-10 seconds per play, 60 plays. It ends up around just a few minutes of actually playing football and the rest youre just standing around.
We’ve said here many times that the reason we play like shit is because we practice like shit. If Morris really fixes that issue, we’ll be a better team.
I’m waiting for the spring game to say much of anything about whether I think things have really changed, unless i can catch a practice.
practice
It appeared in some of the practice / scrimmage video , that I have seen , some 1on1 match ups are being employed. Wondering if Dr.B and FF are hearing or seeing anything about the 1on1 situation and what are the new coaches philosophies on this.
by 5knklshfl on Mar 15, 2011 12:14 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
They are going 1 on 1s but I'm not enthused at the WR blocking or DB's ability to get off.
Not particularly happy with most of what I’ve seen in these videos, aside from some Oklahoma Drills.
I'm starting to feel good about Morris
"If I have asthma, they won't let me scuba. And if I can’t scuba, then what’s this all been about?? What am I working toward??"
"You look like you should be married to one of the San Diego Padres."
I'm not sure if it was something Morris said, or Malzahn
But I read something to the effect of “it’s hard to teach some guys how to do a bunch of different things, so we try to teach them a few things and then give them a bunch of places to stand.”
Meaning simplify the offense and make up for that by confusing the defense with multiple formations, sets, motions, etc.
That is an interesting concept and I’m anxious to see how it works out. Clearly over the past several years our offense has appeared confused and out of sync at times. So, drilling the same few basic offensive plays over and over and over should help rectify that situation.
Also, as someone else mentioned, our (lack of) 2 minute offense should be vastly improved because you are basically in a 2 minute offense all the time.
Malzahn said that.
Meaning simplify the offense and make up for that by confusing the defense with multiple formations, sets, motions, etc.
This is what most other pro-style systems are meant to do, actually doing it is something else entirely.

by 


















