2011 Pre Orange Bowl WR/TE Participation
Clemson has seen drastic improvement this season out of the wide receivers. Today we'll look at the participation numbers for this group in preparation for the Orange Bowl Wednesday night. All information was attained from www.clemsontigers.com. Again, we only looked at "normal" snaps--with "normal" snaps being all non-special teams snaps taken. We put together a similar article earlier that examined such play through the Boston College game. Also, I decided to include the tight ends in this analysis because these players frequently line up flexed or in a slot-type position. Also, our TE's have been an important part of Clemson's passing attack this season.
Here is how the participation allotment looked based on experience level. Note that we did not take into consideration redshirt status, only allocating numbers to the "class" as listed.
In terms of participation, it should be no surprise that Dwayne Allen (829 snaps) leads the team in snaps, followed by Nuk (694) and Sammy (606). Jaron Brown (582) gave CU a lot of quality snaps as did several freshmen (Humphries, Peake, and Bryant). All in all, as shown via the figure above and raw data after the jump, you'll notice that most of the participation from the WR position will return next season (Jones being the only senior with double digit snaps on the team). We are concerned with Allen's potential departure. As shown through these numbers and via his play all season, Dwayne was a big, big part of this offense and the success they enjoyed in 2011.
Now we'll look at production. There are really no surprises here. Sammy and Nuk combined for over 48% of Clemson's receptions and Allen contributed 16.7% of the receptions. Additionally, Jaron Brown contributed roughly 10% of the team's catches. This mean that these four players were responsible for three quarters of Clemson's pass catches to date.
Similar to the reception information, receiving yards were dominated by Allen, Watkins, Hopkins, and Brown. The "Big Four" were responsible for over 80% of CU's reception yardage in 2011. Nuk and Sammy paired up for a ridiculous 55% of Clemson's receiving yards to date. Watkins contributed over 30% of the group's performance, logging 1153 yards through the ACCCG.
Watkins again led the team with 11 touchdown receptions, or 35% of CU's 31 receiving scores on the season. Allen contributed 8 TDs on the year (25% of team output) while Hopkins and Brown both had 4 TD's through the air (approx. 13% of team total). Clemson had 49 plays of 20 yards or greater through the air to date. Again, Sammy leads the team with 18 (36.7%), followed by Nuk's 12 and Allen's 7. I found it extremely interesting that while Martavis Bryant had merely seven receptions on the season, five of those (or 10% of CU's total) went for over 20 yards.
As with the participation information, Clemson will return a large portion of its production next season and will lose only Dwayne Allen (assuming he foregoes his senior season). If Clemson can get production out of the TE position similar to this season or have one of the younger receivers step up to fill Allen's potential void, Clemson's receiving numbers should again be impressive in 2012.
**NOTE** Statistical tables can be found after the jump.
Particiaption by Player:
| # | Player | POS | Cl. | Total Snaps |
| 83 | Dwayne Allen | TE | *Jr. | 829 |
| 6 | DeAndre Hopkins | WR | So. | 694 |
| 2 | Sammy Watkins | WR | Fr. | 606 |
| 18 | Jaron Brown | WR | *Jr. | 582 |
| 16 | Adam Humphries | WR | Fr. | 244 |
| 19 | Charone Peake | WR | Fr. | 213 |
| 80 | Brandon Ford | TE/WR | *Jr. | 201 |
| 1 | Martavis Bryant | WR | Fr. | 183 |
| 26 | Marquan Jones | WR | Sr. | 99 |
| 86 | Sam Cooper | TE | *Fr. | 52 |
| 11 | Bryce McNeal | WR | *So. | 44 |
| 9 | Joe Craig | WR | *Fr. | 39 |
| 47 | Will Harrison | WR | Sr. | 9 |
| 82 | Drew Traylor | TE | *Sr. | 3 |
| 89 | Wes Forbush | WR | *Fr. | 2 |
| 85 | Taylor Ogle | WR | *So. | 2 |
| 38 | Julian Patton | WR | *So. | 1 |
| 84 | Darrell Smith | FB/TE | *So. | 1 |
Participation by Class:
| Class | Snaps | % of Snaps |
| Fr. | 1339 | 35.22% |
| So. | 740 | 19.46% |
| Jr. | 1612 | 42.40% |
| Sr./Gr. | 111 | 2.92% |
| Total | 3802 | 100.00% |
Individual Statistics:
| # | PLAYER | Pos. | G-S | Rec | % of Team's Rec | Yards | % of Team's Yards | Y/Rec | Rec/G | Y/G | TD | % of Team's TDs | 20+ | % of Team's 20+ | LG |
| 2 | Sammy Watkins | WR | 12-9 | 77 | 26.83% | 1153 | 31.15% | 15 | 6.4 | 96.1 | 11 | 35.48% | 18 | 36.73% | 65 |
| 6 | DeAndre Hopkins | WR | 13-10 | 62 | 21.60% | 871 | 23.53% | 14 | 4.8 | 67 | 4 | 12.90% | 12 | 24.49% | 50 |
| 83 | Dwayne Allen | TE | 13-13 | 48 | 16.72% | 577 | 15.59% | 12 | 3.7 | 44.4 | 8 | 25.81% | 7 | 14.29% | 54 |
| 18 | Jaron Brown | WR | 13-11 | 29 | 10.10% | 382 | 10.32% | 13.2 | 2.2 | 29.4 | 4 | 12.90% | 3 | 6.12% | 29 |
| 23 | Andre Ellington | RB | 12-12 | 22 | 7.67% | 109 | 2.94% | 5 | 1.8 | 9.1 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 19 |
| 80 | Brandon Ford | TE/WR | 13-1 | 13 | 4.53% | 166 | 4.48% | 12.8 | 1 | 12.8 | 2 | 6.45% | 3 | 6.12% | 50 |
| 16 | Adam Humphries | WR | 13-2 | 13 | 4.53% | 118 | 3.19% | 9.1 | 1 | 9.1 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 18 |
| 1 | Martavis Bryant | WR | 13-2 | 7 | 2.44% | 201 | 5.43% | 28.7 | 0.5 | 15.5 | 2 | 6.45% | 5 | 10.20% | 54 |
| 19 | Charone Peake | WR | 13-0 | 4 | 1.39% | 71 | 1.92% | 17.8 | 0.3 | 5.5 | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 2.04% | 24 |
| 9 | Joe Craig | WR | 6-0 | 3 | 1.05% | 18 | 0.49% | 6 | 0.5 | 3 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 13 |
| 22 | D.J. Howard | RB | 11-2 | 2 | 0.70% | 2 | 0.05% | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 4 |
| 5 | Mike Bellamy | RB | 12-0 | 2 | 0.70% | 4 | 0.11% | 2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 4 |
| 11 | Bryce McNeal | WR | 3-1 | 1 | 0.35% | 8 | 0.22% | 8 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 8 |
| 26 | Marquan Jones | WR | 12-0 | 1 | 0.35% | 6 | 0.16% | 6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 6 |
| 25 | Roderick McDowell | RB | 12-0 | 1 | 0.35% | -1 | -0.03% | -1 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -1 |
| 63 | Brandon Thomas | OL | 12-9 | 1 | 0.35% | -1 | -0.03% | -1 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -1 |
| 86 | Sam Cooper | TE | 13-0 | 1 | 0.35% | 18 | 0.49% | 18 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 18 |
| Team Total: | 287 | -- | 3702 | -- | 12.9 | 22.08 | 285 | 31 | -- | 49 | -- | 65 | |||
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Adam Humphries
I couldn’t be more impressed with this kid. We have 3 of the top 10 receivers from high school come in, and this kid works his ass off and beats out two of them for playing time. I think Adam will definitely be a Tyler Grisham for our program. Which is the type of players we need. I’ll take heart and work ethic over raw talent any day of the week!
I feel good about our receivers.
Wish Bryant would get more chances because it seems big things happen when he gets the ball. Also want to see Peake more involved. Peake really should have redshirted but I guess he is just too talented. Hopper should definitely redshirt because I don’t see him beating out any of those guys.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Dec 31, 2011 12:17 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Peake didn't redshirt
becuase in all honesty who thought that Brown would have this kind of year? Last year he was shaky at best and unreliable at worst. That he worked his butt off and held off Peake is vbery impressive and he has been money this year. It was even said on STS that during the preseason, Brown was the second most likely reciever to loss his spot to a freshman behind Sammy. Peake will be a big time player soon enough as will Bryant. I like them both a lot. And I agree that Hopper will RS. Just not enough snaps will come his way with all the WR we have.
I do have one question though. In all honesty Allen will leave. Will Ford/Copper/McClain be able to take over for him or can we move another WR in his position as I remember it being said that it’s another slot position?
Off topic but it looks as though we are out of it with Mike Davis.
Looks like if we are going to sign another running back besides Brooks that it will have to be Gurley, which from all reports would not be bad. I don’t think Davis ever gave us much consideration.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Jan 1, 2012 2:08 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Clemson never really pursued him til late
That relationship is already there with other schools.
Clemson got heavy on all 3 of these guys late in the process.
by DrB on Jan 1, 2012 7:33 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think Andre goes pro, but if he leaves, and Bellamy does not come around, DJ Howard is probably the starter.
Nothing against DJ, but if I am Gurley or any big time HS running back, I look at that situation and think I could come in and possibly start. Ofcourse, that does not take Zac Brooks into consideration, and he might be better than Gurley or Davis.
Happy New Year.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Jan 1, 2012 10:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions

by 




















