Clemson @ Georgia Tech Game Preview
| School | Georgia Tech |
| Nickname | Yellow Jackets |
| Athletic Website | http://www.ramblinwreck.com |
| 2011 Record | 6-2 |
| 2010 Record | 6-7 |
| Conference | ACC |
| Head Coach | Paul Johnson |
| Record at School (pre-2011) | 25-15 |
| Game Time | 8:00 EDT |
| Television | ABC |
| Radio | 104.9 WCCP |
| Home Stadium | Bobby Dodd Stadium |
| Offense | Flexbone |
| Offensive Coordinator | Paul Johnson |
| Defense | 3-4 |
| Defensive Coordinator | Al Groh |
Overall Game Preview (thanks to ESPN and the GT Athletic Department--www.ramblinwreck.com for the help):
Paul Johnson is affectionately known as an option master. Johnson's scheme has given Clemson issues in the past, particularly in the '09 ACCCG. Clemson had much more success against the Jackets last season, whipping Georgia Tech at Death Valley. Clemson was completely dominant in the trenches and was able to simply run over GT. On the flip side, I was surprised that Johnson abandoned his trusty option attack at times in favor of pass attempts at critical points during drives.
We have spent most of our time here studying Paul Johnson's offensive system from a defensive point of view, with the lone exception being a piece on specifically on option QB play. Below we've captured a handful of defensive articles along with the aforementioned QB article listed above. We think these are important enough to place on the article's front page. Therefore, do yourself a favor and refresh on these concepts before our Tigers take the field on Saturday. Understanding of these concepts allows one to accurately assess Kevin Steele's defensive performance and adjustment strategy.
Johnson gained national recognition as head coach of two schools, Georgia Southern and Navy, before taking over the Georgia Tech program. Under Johnson's guidance GA Southern won two D1-AA championships ('99 & '00) and was the championship runner up once ('98). Johnson was also the offensive coordinator for two other D1-AA championships at Southern in '85 and '86 under the great Erk Russell.
Johnson's most recognizable success outside of the forfeited 2009 ACC Championship at Tech was probably his tour of duty at Navy. PJ resigned at GA Southern and took over in Annapolis in time for the 2002 season hoping to bring his 1-AA mastery to Division 1 football. The Western Carolina graduate took over a Navy program that had been to one bowl game since the 1981 season and was winless in 2001. After a 2-10 opening campaign, Johnson built a program that has not missed a bowl game since. His highlights with the Midshipmen include a 10-win season in ‘04, the Bobby Dodd Coach of the Year Award, and the school's first victory over Notre Dame (2007) since 1963. His 45-29 record at Navy is nothing less than incredible and it would be a vast understatement to say simply that he left the Navy football program in better shape than he found it.
Everyone reading this is familiar with PJ's success at Georgia Tech. In late-2007, Johnson took over a Yellow Jacket program that was on NCAA probation and was handicapped by reduced scholarships. PJ led the Jackets to a first place tie in the Coastal division in ‘08 and Tech won the ACC in 2009. Johnson was named ACC Coach of the Year for both the 2008 and 2009 seasons. While the Yellow Jackets struggled last season, the Techies rebounded for a strong start to the 2011 season.
PJ proved many critics wrong when he took his flexbone option-based offense to Division 1-A college football and won games. His success is pretty simple: Coach Johnson is a stickler for the fundamentals and his teams generally execute well. We saw this a couple years ago in the ACCCG when the Jackets ran the ball nearly flawlessly all evening. The job that their offensive line did in that contest was incredible and a true testament to their leader's insistence on execution and perfection. PJ will tell you the same thing that we have said year after year: the option (even if you limit the number of plays you run) is nearly unstoppable when each player does his job and plays proper fundamental football. Granted, when everyone does their jobs, any offense is nearly unstoppable.
I'll keep this short and sweet (the links above explain these concepts very well). The main objective for the flexbone is to establish the fullback dive. The dive sets up everything in this offense including the veer/option attack and the passing game. If we cannot stop this, Clemson will give up a ton of yards and points. The next key is the QB. Hit him every time GT runs the football but each player must maintain his specific assignment. Missed assignments get you killed quickly against the option. Then there is the pitch, but again that is goes back to proper fundamentals and assignment football. The final item is the forward pass. GT likes to lull you to sleep then ding you, particularly off of play action or a quasi-option look.
We will warn you, though; Georgia Tech has garnered a reputation for being a high flying more-pass happy offense this season. The have scored quite a few TD's off of long passes, but the Jackets still only have 102 pass attempts at the 8 game mark (12.75 pass attempts per game). I admit they are more impressive in the passing game this year but don't want folks to lose sight of the fact that they have run the ball well over four times as many times as they've thrown this season. If they hit a big one it will be after monotonously running the dive and an array of option plays. To the counterpoint, GT looked terrible offensively last week after starting the year racking up tons of yards against lesser opponents.
Clemson will likely show a wide array of looks as they did last season. We saw three man fronts with an End playing Jack, four man fronts, and five man fronts. We've explained that a lot of these looks really end up incorporating the same schemes, particularly when you compare a 4-3 under look to some 5-2 looks. We also described how to use the Bear front to defend Ga Tech a while back, so look into this guy as well. Here is another useful link that reminds you how fronts are used, particularly the 3-4 and multiple switches.
Clemson needs run support from the DBs. I will caution that these guys cannot get caught sleeping or we will give up six. However, I look for Steele to slide a safety into the box and get creative to free a guy like Meeks up to help with run support. I just hope Mr. Meeks remembers that he has arms and can wrap up when he is filling the alley. Kill shots are nice...unless you miss, then they are just lots of yards given up.
Look for us to sit in Cover 4 coverage or split coverage (quarters to one side, C2 on the boundary) most of the day. Both safeties in C4 will probably be within 10 yards of the LOS. They must be looking for the crackback block from the WR as well as an arc block from the Wingback, it is critical they play these blocks well.
In our film study of Tech over this season, and we do watch them a good bit because we love watching a well-run option, we've noticed that in the last 3 games several things have occured to limit them. First, Tevin Washington has been forced to keep the ball on the Veer because opponents are taking away his pitchman. Tevin is not the runner that Nesbitt was, not even close. The scheme that Maryland and Miami used was actually the same that Clemson has used against Tech before, but in the Miami game the MLB Spence was all over the place. In the MD game, their DT basically ripped GT's OL apart with 22 tackles in one game. Second, Tech has failed to hit WR Stephen Hill in the passing game. He's not getting open like he was now that folks are keying on him. Washington hasn't thrown the most beautiful ball in his direction in any case. Finally, and most importantly, Tech's OL has not played well whatsoever. Their Wings miss blocks that they were hitting earlier. Their linemen don't generate push inside for the Dive, and their Tackles aren't getting the LB's blocked on the Veer (otherwise the pitch would be uncovered). If Smith gets the ball on the pitch though, watch out.
Al Groh took over GT's defensive coordinator position after parting ways with the University of Virginia following the 2009 campaign. Groh's background is too extensive for me to discuss fully, but I will mention a few items. Al has been coaching at all levels since the late ‘60's and has plenty of college and professional coaching experience. Groh was the head coach at Wake in the early ‘80's, followed Bill Parcells around for quite a while, became the Jets head man for a year, then took over the head job at Virginia (where he likened his immense intellect and NFL experience to playing chess while the rest of the conference was playing checkers). Unfortunately for Al, the Chessmaster was taken to school by much of the conference (again, as if his Wake Forest experience wasn't enough) and got the axe. Apparently he was not as smart as he thought himself to be. Groh is noted for his 3-4 defense and is in the process of molding and recruiting players to better fit his defensive scheme though.
Groh's 3-4 system is the basic one that has survived from the 1980s. It's two-gapped Okie and requires a NG that can absorb a double-team. They don't have one, and in fact its a small front line. Dr. B, frustrated about the misinformation floating around, put together an insightful piece on 3-4 basics over the summer. Remember to pay attention to specifics on the two-gap scheme and not the single gapper Bum's Son used at Dallas.
Georgia Tech was extremely soft up front last season. Clemson ran the ball at will against the Jackets. Unfortunately, the Tigers decided to quit running the ball during the 2nd or 3rd quarters. We questioned at the time whether or not this was to try to jump start Kyle Parker but now are resigned to the fact that the offensive staff had no clue what it was doing last season outside of the Auburn game.
The Jackets have improved since last year on the defensive side of the football, particularly with their fronts. I am definitely not saying they are killers up front, just better than a year ago. Clemson flat out blew them off the football last season in Death Valley, and I don't expect to see the same result, at least not to the tune of what happened a year ago. Ga Tech will have to go to nickel to defend Clemson's spread offense. Tech likes to show three down linemen and creep a LB to the LOS on the weakside, effectively leaving two backers in the field's middle. That LB is the best one in our opinion. We'd take him here. Groh has brought both of these guys at times this season and I wouldn't necessarily be surprised to see him mix in 3, 4, 5, and 6 man pressure schemes, especially to try and confuse our Sophomore QB. Their blitzes tend to be zone blitzes and twists. Along those same lines, I expect a multitude of coverages including C1, C4, and some combo coverages, but they are primarily a spot drop Cover 2 team.
Obviously the Clemson offense will try to keep on doing what it has been doing. We need Tajh Boyd to avoid silly mistakes and to stay patient reading coverages. Also, while GT's secondary has improved year over year, they are susceptible. Tech is better deep than a year ago but can still be beaten underneath easily. I also wouldn't be scared to heave the ball down the field. I'll take Clemson's WR's deep over GT's secondary any day, particularly if we get some one on one situations. You know the drill on the ground...A gap to A gap with the deep back plus the standard buck sweeps, jet sweeps, and possibly an inside counter or two. Should be standard operating procedures for Clemson's "O." We all know that D.J. Howard will be starting, but that shouldn't effect Clemson's strategy. Morris has faith in Howard because he has played well when inserted into football games in '11.
Georgia Tech Schedule (thanks ESPN)
Clemson/UNC Highlights
Clemson Ga Tech Highlights 2010
Ga Tech/Miami Highlights
Ga Tech vs. Kansas
Ga Tech vs NC State
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting
I really am not that afriad of either their O or D for reasons stated. Washington is not Nesbitt nad isn’t built like him, and thier D, while better than last year, isn’t good enough to really slow us down when we’re clicking. With a new center in the game I expect B.Thompson to dominate the mibble and take away the FB option and the rest is simply playing smart. If Steele soesn’t show us that he can stop the option then I will have to start questioning what we’re doing in practice during the week. Landon walker said that he never forgot 08 and 09 and the pain that GT has given us. I want to crush them, plain and simple.
You saw that their D has improved over last year so I don’t expect our O-line to do what it did against MD but also not as bad, run blocking wise, against NC. Should we expect double teams on Sammy or will they roll the dice like NC did and single cover to blitz and pressure more?
I read Landon Walker's comments, as well. and that made me want this win even more.
You know we are not looking past this one, so it is just a matter of going down to Atlanta and taking care of business.
I read that their starting center was out, so I would imagine Brandon thompson will cause all kinds of trouble in the middle. Also, with Ellington out, I would guess that they will play a lot more nickle and dare us to run it. Like yall, I think DJ is up to the challenge.
GO TIGERS!
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Oct 28, 2011 9:35 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Agreed
Going nickel anyway is useless as we’re going to torch them in the air. Until I see it happen, I refuse to believe that there is a team in america with a secondary good enough to stop our WR/TE. I love how hard Howard runs and look for him and Bellamy to tag team well, if Bellamy holds onto the ball. You can’t grip about PT and be the only RB to have fumbled this year, twice in fact.
DJ
I’m ready to see him in the start as well. A big week for him here and he will officially be a “Steal” in recruiting terms. I remember when we signed him a lot of folks on rivals from Alabama said he was better than his rating, just had a bad injury. Well then this is the time to see!
"Just because you've had 2 or 3 good games doesn't mean anything right now. It's not the first 3 games you're going to be remembered by." - The Chad
by scgreatest803 on Oct 28, 2011 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I think DJ will be just fine, and agree that Mike needs to make sure he holds onto the ball.
Turnovers and mistakes could be our undoing in a game like this.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Oct 28, 2011 11:23 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Playing smart, assignment football is not what our D is known for this year
Not to mention the poor tackling. I fear our D more than I fear them.
by ggggmen08 on Oct 28, 2011 12:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Agreed
but in this game against this kind of team, Steele needs to earn his pay and knock some heads together. GT has always been a thorn in our side and 08,09 still hurts, a lot. Still, our D has, when thier backs are agaisnt the wall, come up with a stop whenever we truly need them, and I look for more of the same tommorrow
what a weak schedule
the somewhat decent teams either played them close or outright beat them…. i hate to be so over confident but we really should drum them. hopefully we learned from our mistakes against wofford
This one was circled
Right after we won the “Tour of Champions” or whatever Dabo termed the early season schedule… ESPN3 better not let me down!!!!!
"Just because you've had 2 or 3 good games doesn't mean anything right now. It's not the first 3 games you're going to be remembered by." - The Chad
i hope the players read the news
seemingly every internet site including Rivals, CBSsports, and ESPN (god its everywhere on that god forsaken site of ill informed writers) have picked this game as the one Clemson loses. Its really irratating to get this little bit of respect this late in the season. The players shouldnt need that as motivation but, it sure fires me up. This is one school I’d like to see, cease to exist.
Well, this one worries me as much or more than any of the remaining games.
That said, I think we can definitely win it. I am sure our guys have been waiting on this one a long time, so I don’t see us looking past it. Also, I am sure the defense knows this is a big challenge, and wants to prove they can stop GT’s offense, so you know they will come in ready to go.
Did yall watch the Miami/UVA game last night? Miami’s defense did not look good, and they only gave up one TD against GT. I also thought Miami’s offense was not very good. I just do not think GT has played the same level of competition as us, and their stats were inflated against the likes of WCU and Kansas.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Oct 28, 2011 11:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
That's true
They really haven’t shredded anyone good excpet UNC. And UNC’s O is still a bit shaky in my opinon. With a new center lined up against B. Thompson, I look for the dive to be taken away by Thompson and Moore. This puts more pressure on Washington who has not looked impressive at all these last few games.
Coastal Divison Scheduling
With the exception of Miami, has anyone else noticed that the coastal division really took it quite easy on themselves in terms of OOC scheduling?
Duke- Stanford, Richmond, FIU, Tulane
GTech- MTSU, Western Carolina, Kansas, UGA
Miami- Ohio St, K. State, Bethune, USF
UNC- James Madison, Rutgers, ECU, Louisville
VA- William and Mary, Indiani, So Miss, Idaho
VTech- App State, Ark State, ECU, Marshall
I also believe that the way their conference games were setup (G-Tech, UNC, and V Tech in particular), these teams have yet to truly prove their “hot starts” and records. Lots of crucial late season matchups left. I think as of now it’s no telling who we see in the conference chip.
"Just because you've had 2 or 3 good games doesn't mean anything right now. It's not the first 3 games you're going to be remembered by." - The Chad
I agree with the
Last two teams you listed. UVA, VT really need to man up out of conference. This is a trend as the last couple times they did schedule a big boy OOC it didn’t turn out that well. They are really just a very good consistent but never great team and I don’t think they want this ceiling exposed, you just can’t recruit that well to B’Burg.
UNC though pickedup up three “decent” teams and GT at least plays UGA so they are OK. Duke and Miami both took on powers in Stanford and Ohio St. (they suck but very unlikely scenario when it was scheduled) so they get a pass from me.
Anyone concerned about the fact that it's their homecoming game?
obviously they’ll be at their most fired up all year, most likely. Puts more emphasis on us scoring early to take the crowd out of it. But we usually start slow and end fast when the other team is tired. And it has taken a quarter or more for Boyd to settle down in the other away games this year. I’m afraid we might find ourselves in yet another hole by halftime this week. I just hope it’s not too deep to dig out.
I say play smart and a little conservative until Boyd shows he’s accurate and settled down (NO PICK SIXES THIS GAME, TAJH). Run the ball with DJ, do short high percentage passes to Allen and the backs or underneath routes to the WRs to get us going, then hit them downfield with Nuke, Watkins, and Bryant when we’re in sync. Emphasize ball security and keep away. I believe in our defense to stop them if we give them decent field position (kickoff coverage!) and don’t turn the ball over 3 times in the first half or something. Watch for the early trick plays. If we can do that I think we pull away big time and win by 30 in the second half.
Also, this game is extremely important to set up the Wake Forest game. Win and we eliminate all but us and WF for the division. Lose and we breath new life into the division. It’s time to step on the gas and pull away in the division like we do in games. Tommy could never do this. Will Dabo, Steele, and Morris do it?
I'll also add the Napoleonic maxim: "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
In context that means, if they want to screw up and turn the ball over to us or give us great field position, capitalize on it. This is particularly relevant, as they seem to be prone to it over the past few games.
I just turned on the BYU-TCU game to check on the score...
And the very first thing I hear the announcers say is “Sammy Watkins is the best freshman in college football”. It’s great when announcers of other random games are talking about Clemson by the 3rd quarter.
Excellent thorough detailed analysis as always.
I agree with just about everything you’ve written. The root cause of our offensive problems has been the OL, and losing our starting C doesn’t help. I’m surprised that the defensive stats are that good, b/c from an eyetest they’re not that impressive esp the DL which just isn’t big, strong, and aggressive enough for a 3-4. Like you said though, they have improved a fair amount from last year where we couldn’t stop the run to save our life. We lost 3 LBs for UVA which definitely affected our defensive performance in that game, and as I recall we got 2 of them back for Miami, which helped explain the considerably better defense. Hopefully it’ll be a well-played exciting game tonight and may the best team win!
by The Bamboo Shaft on Oct 29, 2011 11:35 AM EDT reply actions
Win and prove to everyone that we ARE who we hope we are, lose and prove what they think we are
We have the talent, lets show them. Start strong, keep the pedal down, don’t let up, and wrap up!!!!

by 


















