Tuesday Press Conference: Do Your Job
Do Your Job. This was the phrase used over and over this morning in Dabo's press conference as he previews this weeks game against Georgia Tech. Discipline will be key this weekend if Clemson is to have success stopping the triple option. Last time the Tigers traveled to Atlanta, it wasn't pretty from a defensive perspective, as the Yellow Jackets accumulated 400+ yards and 30 points (24 of which came in the first half) and Clemson wasn't able to overcome a 17 point halftime deficit. We cannot afford to get behind again this year, and have to limit the big plays if we are going to be successful defensively (everyone remembers the Anthony Allen 82 yard run early in the first quarter).
Their offense, everyone is familiar with. They lead the nation in third down. They're usually one of the top rushing teams. The big thing about them is that they have thrown the ball more. The big plays, that's a concern. It's the biggest concern I have in going against their offense. They've had eight, one-play touchdown drives. We have to do a great job of being disciplined. Everyone has to get locked in on their keys and do their job. The big play is something we have to minimize.
When you think of a Paul Johnson led team, you think of the triple option offense. Until you look it up, you don't realize that Georgia Tech's defense ranks 1st in the Conference in Pass Defense and 4th in Total Defense. The 24 points given up to the Hurricanes last weekend? Not the complete result of an Al Groh defense. Quite the contrary, as it was the Georgia Tech offense that turned the ball over three times leading to scoring opportunities for the Canes.
If Clemson can some how force a turnover or two like they did this past Saturday, they can really do some damage to this Georgia Tech defense. The Yellow Jackets seem most susceptible on the ground, where they rank behind Clemson as the 10th best rush defense in the conference, giving up 170+ yards a game. I guess the bigger question is, can Clemson exploit the shaky Georgia Tech run defense with a banged up Andre Ellington who will be limited in practice this week and two freshman running backs (one of which has been inconsistent holding onto the ball)?
Their defense, I'm impressed with them. They've gotten better. In ACC games, they're leading the league in total defense. They're stout and don't give up a lot of big plays. You have to earn what you get from these guys. For us, it's about us and have a great week of preparation. Today and tomorrow are critical days from a scout team perspective. We've played with great effort each week. We've done a good job of creating turnovers.
When looking at this matchup, some pundits have sort of made a big deal over the Wofford game earlier in the year, because the Terriers run a similar offense to Georgia Tech. Clemson certainly struggled defensively in that game, giving up almost 400 yards and 27 points. Much like the Georgia Tech/Clemson game in 2009, the Tigers gave up big plays early to Wofford including a 27 yard run, and a 66 yard pass, both in the first quarter, and both resulting in touchdowns. After that, Clemson only gave up one more touchdown the rest of the game. If the Wofford game is any indication of how things will play out on Saturday, Clemson will need to limit the big plays early against the Yellow Jackets to avoid getting behind and having to battle back on the road.
Forget everything we've taught you all year because it has nothing to do with our normal defense. It's a game within the season that is totally different. We try to expose our players to things in camp they're going to see. It's not the same type of pass skeleton during the week. It's assignment football and it's a game plan for this opponent. When the game is over, you can put it on the shelf for next year.
As coaches and players, there are going to be distractions as the season unfolds. With Clemson, in the past it has been the College Football world writing off the Tigers for poor starts or its inability to finish games. This year, it's completely different. Clemson is 8-0 and the darlings of College Football right now. Everywhere you turn Clemson is on ESPN and it seems Tajh or Sammy is winning some kind of award every week. Props to Dabo and this staff for keeping this team focused. The last thing we want this team to do is get a big head and lay an egg in Atlanta this weekend. Keeping this team focused and grounded will only continue to get harder if this team keeps winning football games. It will be up to the coaches and team leaders to make sure we stay hungry and humble.
It's great for Clemson. I love being 8-0. Heck yeah. I'd rather be 8-0 than 4-4. It's great for our program, it's great for the Clemson brand, absolutely. But it doesn't have anything to do with beating Georgia Tech. I know there is a lot of talk but our goals are right over there. We have a division championship, a state championship, an ACC championship, those things before we can even thing about the BCS.
Paul Johnson will have his team prepared this weekend. This is a Conference rivalry game for both teams. It's always dangerous facing a team that has its back against the wall as the Yellow Jackets do after losing two straight. Paul Johnson knows that if they are to have any shot at getting to Charlotte, they have to win on Saturday. Clemson hasn't won in Atlanta since 2003. And the last time Clemson started the season this strong, they beat North Carolina to go 8-0 only to drop their ninth game the following week to Georgia Tech.
This is certainly a different Clemson team from the 2000 version. However, Clemson will need to play it's most complete game of the season to win this weekend. The offense cannot turn the ball over, this defense must avoid giving up big plays, and the Tigers have to prevent getting down early like they did in 2009. Buckle up, I think this is going to be a dogfight.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Punch them in the mouth
I don’t really give their D that much credit, dispite the rankings, and would run/throw all over them like it was no tommorrow. Thankfully, being in Atlanta at night hsould be different than our othe rnight games. VT was our first night game in a cold, windy and wet environment. Maryland was a night game against a team that we were not schematically prpared for. GT doesn’t hide what they do. They’re going to line up and run thier option and force us to play fundamental D against them. Moore and Thompson in the middle and our success stopping NC and for the most part BC on the ground makes me feel better about stopping that part of the option. We now have to stop the pitch and force their QB to beat us, which he couldn’t do against either Virgina and Miami. Also, I highly doubt their DBs can handle our WRs. With Andre iffy, Bellmay finally gets his chance to prove himself and hopefuly we’ll see more of Howarda as well.
Good points as always D'Arve
I agree that their DB’s won’t be able to contain our WRs. Right now everything is clicking in that department with Allen, Bryant, Nuke, Watkins, and now Brandon Ford playing solid football. We have more weapons than GT will know what to do with from that standpoint. Our offense will gets ours. I just worry about our young defense giving up big plays or possibly worse, long drives (thus keeping our offense off the field).
The flip to that is
That our O has proven that it can also eat up the clock and go methodically down the field and score. That 7 minute drive against Auburn comes to mind. So if we get ahead of them, and their D finally gets gassed which will happen, then WE could be the ones to play the tme of possession game. It’s an interesting thought.
You are right, and if our D has a hard time getting off the field, then it would behuve us is our offense ate some clock, just to give the defense a rest.
I tend to think that if we are going to lose one of the last four reg season games that this would be it, but I feel better about our chances now than I did a couple of weeks ago.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Oct 25, 2011 4:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Their D can't stop our O
And their O has not been impressive at all the past few weeks. I hope Steele watched A LOT of tape on the Miami and Virgina wins as well as tape from how we took them out last year and gets our D to step it up this week. I would like ot see a lot of Anthony but and weary of putting a freshman, albeit and good one, in such a situation.
Makes sense
If we can just play solid the first half of the game I think we should win this game. As long as we aren’t down going into half I think we win. Our love the adjustments this staff makes (i.e. Morris when UNC went Cover 0 the first half). The 2nd half adjustments + our offense being able to wear down defenses has boded well for us all season.
Except against MD
Didn’t look like Steele made the right adjustments until the end of the third quarter.
They have one of the highest rated defenses
but they haven’t played the best offenses, Clemson and themselves.
Who has GT played that is good?
Kansas was not any good.
UNC was good, but that was a close game.
I think Miami is ok, but not great.
UVA is not good, but didn’t UVA have extra time to prepare?
They have not played Wake, who is having a decent year.
They have not played FSU or VT, which besides us, are the best teams in the ACC, and we have played both of those teams.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Oct 25, 2011 5:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I have watched their defense, and this is one case that I point to
about avoiding stat comparisons. If you read the stats you think this D is great.
They are not when you watch them, but they have improved over last year for sure.
D
My concern is the struggles we’ve had vs qbs that take the snap and run. I also love the “in game” & halftime adjustments we make now. Hope we’re not down ever, much less at half. Hopefully it’s not as close as our games with them usually are
by TigerFan74 on Oct 25, 2011 2:06 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Ive been worried about this game all year.
Hopefully the Jackets will continue their current funk against us.
"He knows where he's throwing. If he didn't, there'd be dead bodies strewn all over Idaho." - Washington Senators scout on Walter Johnson
Big win here sets the stage
I think if we take this one convincingly in ATL, have a week off to heal up (much needed at this point), we set ourselves up nicely to win the conference. I really don’t see Wake or NC State matching up.
After the FSU game, my goals for the team this year morphed into 10 reg season wins and a conf chip. Anything above that will just be icing on the cake.. One way or another I think we will be serious contenders for the next two-three years. That’s one of the things I love about college football, player turnover is high, so while there are solid dynasty’s out there, with the perfect storm of the proper coaches in place combined with a few strong recruiting classes, and good leaders, your team can make a nice 2-4 year serious run at a title. (Then your coaching staff gets raided by desperate teams willing to overpay, and you start over again. Such is life.)
"Just because you've had 2 or 3 good games doesn't mean anything right now. It's not the first 3 games you're going to be remembered by." - The Chad
GT does most of its damage on the perimeter. Thwart the pitch, keep it inside, & make Washinton beat us.
Back in the olden days when I played high school football, and everybody (including my team) ran the option, defenses typically ran a 5-man-front (like the Monster 5-2 if I remember correctly). The DE’s were responsible for stepping up into the backfield at the expense of the C-gap, bookending the QB, and forcing everything back inside by stopping, disrupting, or deepening the pitch (and possibly forcing a few pitches to the ground). The 3 interior DL’s tied up the interior and kept the OLs off the LBs. The CBs (and safeties as necessary) played man and didn’t worry about run-support until there was zero chance that the ball could still be passed. The LBs & safeties cleaned up everything else. And everybody was responsible for whacking the snot out of the QB every chance possible. Wouldn’t that work against GT?
When I watch GT play nowadays, I’m always shocked by how easily teams allow GT to pitch and beat them on the perimeter, where (if you look at the in-game tracking stats) GT does most of its rushing damage, by far. Last year, NCSU beat GT largely by thwarting the pitch and forcing a few bad pitches (if I remember correctly) with a 4-man front and an LB walked up outside the strong side DE (essentially creating that anti-option 5-man front). I think Steele basically did the same thing last year with Branch (or was it Brown) as the 5th guy. What schemes will Steele employ this week?
I agree with you that the pitch is usually what gives us fits when we play these teams.
For one, if the pitch is made then the defender pretty much has to make an open field tackle.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Oct 25, 2011 4:50 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Its a Bear front you refer to
3 linemen covering the inside G-C-G, with Ends widened up to attack QB and force the pitch.
Clemson does not typically run a ton of Bear front against them, but we have run it.
Likely we’ll show the same 4-3 with the OLBs widened and the MLB deeper to help on the pitch read, with both DEs in 2 point stances on Dive-to-QB responsibility….then switch it up with some 3-4.
as long as washington can't throw on us well be fine
the safeties have not been good this year and if we start getting beat by #5 then we are in trouble
by sendthemtotheGRAVE on Oct 25, 2011 10:33 PM EDT reply actions

















