Clemson Basketball - Previewing the Roster
As Part II of our basketball season preview, we'll look at Clemson's roster and what reasonable expectations should be for this group.
Clemson enters pre-season practice with plenty of question marks. The biggest question mark is who is going to take Demontez Stitt's spot in the starting lineup? This question arises because Clemson lacked depth last year and aren't able to carry over talented depth to this year's team. This forces the Tigers to rely on instant impacts from true freshman. This is not an ideal scenario and was caused by two things: 1) Clemson making a coaching change and only being able to bring in one recruit last year, and 2) a pair of early season transfers last year from Noel Johnson and Donte Hill, followed by the offseason transfer of Cory Stanton. That leaves us with this roster:
Clemson's 2011-2012 Basketball Roster (courtesy www.clemsontigers.com)
We'll start with the bright side. Clemson does return 3 starters and 4 of their top 6 players. We know that Andre Young, Tanner Smith, Milton Jennings, and Devin Booker will start and be asked to play a lot of minutes this year. That's an experienced group consisting of 2 seniors and 2 juniors. We will have to rely on these veterans to help the young guys along because we lack experienced talent. SR Catalin Baciu (Bobo) and Brian Narcisse will be relied on to provide minutes. Bobo is a long body that we hope can be disruptive on defense, but other than that we don't expect much out of him this year. Narcisse has tremendous athletic ability and has shown he is able to knock down an occasional 3, but he lacks the ball skills and basketball IQ necessary to play 30 minutes a game.
That brings us to the freshman. According to early reports, Brownell looks like he may have a steal in TJ Sapp. He has turned heads early, showing off a game that is similar to Stitt's. Both are combo guards that excel at getting into the paint. Sapp appears to have a better looking stroke than Stitt. That being said, he isn't going to put up Stitt like numbers as a freshman. If he does get the starting nod in the backcourt with Young, I'd be happy if he were able to put up 7-8 PPG, dish out a couple of assists, limit turnovers, and play solid defense. We don't need him to become our main option on offense as a freshman. We just need him to help run the offense and provide an offensive threat.
Devin Coleman and Rod Hall are two other freshman that should see backcourt minutes this year. And although Sapp has received the most hype early, it wouldn't surprise me if one of these guys were able to jump into the starting lineup. Both guys are physically ready to play in the ACC right now. Coleman is a slashing lefty that has more of an offensive game than Hall. Hall is going to get his playing time due to his effort on the defensive end. He looks like a strong safety and has some people already calling him the best defender on the team. He expects to be a work in progress offensively.
In the frontcourt, KJ McDaniels and Bernard Sullivan should also see minutes as true freshmen. McDaniel is an extremely athletic wing. Think Narcisse athleticism with more potential as a complete basketball player. His playing time will mostly come spelling Tanner Smith. He could potentially play 2-guard in a pinch. Sullivan was the most hyped recruit out of high school. He will provide depth to a very thin frontcourt. I like his game and think he has potential, but I don't expect too much offensively. He will need to mature physically and find a way to score on taller defenders (he's list at 6'7) in order to produce at this level.
So where should we expect to finish in the ACC this year? Too many times I here the uninformed masses say "Clemson lost so-and-so and they are going to stink this year". These same people do not realize the additions and subtractions that occur at other teams. Therefore, when I try to distinguish where Clemson will fit in to the conference race, I look at the rosters of the other 11 ACC teams before forming my opinion. That being said, here is my opinion.
I think it's clear that UNC and Duke are the head of the class. UNC is a national title favorite and Duke is certainly a top 10 team. At the other end of the spectrum, I expect Wake Forest and BC to be the two worst teams in the conference. Wake was terrible last year and lost several starters to offseason transfers. BC on the other hand practically lost their entire team to graduation, leaving them with a lineup that should feature at least 4 freshmen starters.
Georgia Tech and Maryland are going through rebuilding phases after hiring new coaches in the offseason. Georgia Tech lost their best player in Iman Shumpert and the rest of their roster is lacking in talent. Maryland, on the other hand, is struggling to find enough scholarship players. Their frontcourt is very thin, inexperienced, and talent deprived. I don't see Clemson being worse than either of these teams.
Virginia Tech is another team I expect Clemson to finish better than this year. VT lost close to 70% of their minutes from last year. They are bringing in a talented freshmen class, but I think Clemson's experience wins out.
So we've now narrowed our possibilities down to 3-7. I think FSU is the 3rd best team in the conference. They showed last year that they are going to be just fine without Chris Singleton. They also have experience on the roster to replace Derwin Kitchen in Luke Loucks and Ian Miller.
Given Clemson's favorable conference schedule this year, I'd peg Clemson anywhere from 4-7 in the conference. I think NC State, UVA, and Miami are all on Clemson's level in terms of talent and experience.
I see these 4 teams as middle of the pack teams that will be fighting for an NCAA berth at the end of the year.
Thoughts? Am I too optimistic? Pessimistic? Realistic?
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
4-7 sounds about right
But there are way too many unknowns as well. This team obviously has a ceiling on it, but I’m not sure where the floor is. Brownell is a good coach but I could still see them finishing pretty lowly at the end of the day, as low as 10
by tripp1 on Oct 20, 2011 4:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Sounds about right
Good writeup as usual, ggggmen. I agree with you. I think our schedule is favorable for a top 4 finish in the ACC again. We are probably middle of pack talent wise on par with uva, miami and nc state. I expect brownell to get the most out of these guys. It’s definitely good to have 6 guys comfortable with BB’s system. I think a few of our freshmen are going to really surprise alot of people. I think Sapp will play wih a chip on his shoulder cause he felt like he was better then a lot of people that got more press then him. And Coleman is built for the ACC. Gonna be a good guy to get i to the lane and get some and ones.
by PennTiger on Oct 20, 2011 4:18 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Who's the say
that our freshmen won’t come in and perform like our young football team? A good coach will get the most out of any player and should that player have a good amount of talent, all the better, Brownell has my faith in his ability to use what he’s got and I look for Sapp to be a great addition to the team immediatly.
Watkins came in as a top 3 WR recruit
Sapp comes in as a top 50 PG recruit. Big difference there.
I expect him to play well, but I’m not expecting an Austin Rivers like impact. I think you’ll end up disappointmented if that’s the case.
by ggggmen08 on Oct 20, 2011 5:51 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It was an exaggeration
I meant more along the lines of that maybe these freshmen can play above the level expected of them becuase of thier youth like our football team has done.
The team's success will depend upon it
so lets hope you’re right. I do expect them to exceed expectations, as Sullivan was the only hyped recruit.
Any early word on Narcisse
He surprised me last year and took his offensive game to another level (basically from non-existant to consistently being a spark guy). Any chance he surprises this year, either way love the hustle he brings to the team.
I think you'll see more out of him, but he just doesnt have much talent.
He’ll have to step up his game, because he will have to play as a 3 or 4 outside.
Like the Preview ggggmen08
Nice preview. I really see this team playing like the first half of last season for the whole season this year. I feel that the front court players can probably contribute earlier than say Sullivan (who’s body appears to need a little work…) because of strength and positioning inside. I will be anxious to see the development of Booker, Jennings, and Baicu as I felt Stitt and Grant really developed last year under Brownell and his assistants’ coaching. I think our offense will be hurt most, but if teams play defense they can always stay in the game. I look for Clemson to be competitive in most of their games. Let’s see what happens towards the end of the year. I think it will be vital to get a big body to play inside in 12-13. Let’s hope Brownell recruits as good as I think he can coach…Go Tigers!
Good analysis.
I have a lot of confidence in Brownell, and think much of our success will depend on if Jennings and Booker can live up to their potential.
"Clemson is coming!" - Stephone Anthony
by Tigerplowboy on Oct 20, 2011 9:03 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I really hope you're right, but Clemson also lost their best two players
Jennings and baby Booker have been busts so far. Booker plays too soft. He’s got the body to really dominate if he had some balls. Jennings…I dont know what to say about him. He looks so lost out there. He runs around on defense like a chicken with his head cut off. I love Tanner’s b-ball IQ, just wish he had a little better shooting stroke. Andre Young has really developed a nice outside jumpshot. Losing Stanton is no big deal, he wasnt even average, he had no business being in the ACC.
I hope the freshman can contribute right away. They’re going to be counted on for significant minutes this year. With Brownell’s stressing defense so much, I guess we’ll be winning some games 50-45. But thats OK, a win is a win for Clemson B-ball.
Big things to remember going into this season
1 – For the first time in 10 years, we were better in March than we were in December. Everyone was jumping off the band wagon a year ago after early losses to Michigan and USC. We have 6 freshman this year. They’re going to get better, but there could be some bumps early.
2 – Jerai Grant came out of NOWHERE last year. He dunked and blocked shots for 3 years before finally realizing his potential. Hoping to see Book, Jennings, or both take that kind of leap this year and begin to play they way we’ve always hoped they could.
3 – We dont need the freshman to be great.. we need them to be good.. in spurts.. and to find a niche. From what i hear. DC can score, TJ will play point, RH can D up, KJ is a freak of an athlete, and i pray that BS can be our 3rd big. I think TJ and BS will be asked to do more than the others.
Hoping for another 9-7 ACC season.
great analysis
Someone is going to step up. I think Bobo will be a factor and all of the experienced players will be better in a year when the ACC is not as competitive.

by 
















