Moving Forward: Post Auburn and through the bye week
Auburn is in the books, and it is time to look forward to conference play. While losing to the Tigers in retrospect is disheartening, from my preseason predictions it was not unexpected. I have discussed our shortcomings until I am red in the face here, and would like to talk about some of the things that went right last Saturday then focus on what Clemson needs to do to win at least 10 games this fall.
Clemson looked really good early on. If I had to guess, our staff prepared the first drive of the Auburn game all offseason and did a very good job. Clemson was quick to move away from what did not work into what did work. We got the ball to our best offensive players and were able to finish off the drive. Clemson came out and brought the war, which was nice to see. Clemson was also able to control the ball the entire first half. This was refreshing to see. There is no doubt that this team is better off now than it was 2 years ago but still has a lot of work to do to improve and meet our expectations.
Andre Ellington is the back that I said he would be. Over and over this offseason I said that he was a better running back (not athlete) than C. J. Spiller and he is making me look good. No doubt CJ is the man and is better in open space, but Ellington sees the holes and hits them extremely effectively. Ellington has great vision, makes a single cut, then hits the hole. This is essential when running the ball behind zone blocking techniques.
Jamie Harper showed off the soft hands that Dabo talked about all offseason. His TD catch was fantastic and one of the best ones I have seen this season. Harper needs to work on utilizing his big body to get North/South to get simple yards. Harper will be a fantastic back if he can learn to get to the hole quicker and not dance around. I think that he has the talent and that a little more film study and discipline getting upfield will get him there. With Clemson's woes catching the ball, I also would not mind seeing Harper flexed out to give us more threats in the forward passing area.
Kyle Parker played well against Auburn. He missed a few but really stuck in there on third down attempts and kept Clemson in the game late. We are fortunate that KP decided to come back to school and hopefully can build some leads this year so that Boyd gets some quality snaps. In no way does last week's loss get put on his shoulders, as Kyle was on target most of the game and kept on cruising through thick and thin. Kyle was constantly under pressure but was able to stand in the pocket and deliver the football.
Clemson played really well up front defensively in the first half and at the end of the game. Bowers got it going realy and helped keep the Auburn Tigers in check early. The big complaint that I have about our DL is that we seemed to get a little fatigued in the second half. Our pad level rose and we lost contain at times. Otherwise, we did a better job than most expected against Auburn.
The whole Clemson team had issues in the third quarter. I am not sure whether this can be attributed to Auburn's adjustments or Clemson's complacency. Either way, we have plenty to fix this fall and cannot endure lapses like this. As I have mentioned before, Dabo played for a legend and has a legend who lives just down the road. He is a sharp guy and will hopefully get advice on how to get the troops to maintain the killer instinct for 60 minutes. We are better off today than we were two years ago but we need to keep progressing if we hope to become a consistent force in college football.
I really hope this loss is a learning experience for the young guys on this staff. I thought that the Georgia Tech and Maryland games last season were learning experiences, so hopefully we will take the shortcomings of this contest and use them effectively in the future. Again, we got cute at an inopportune time and again it contributed to the final outcome of the football game. I hope that we realize that we can compete with others without resorting to trickery.
Like I said earlier, we have a lot of things to work on if we want to be a good football team. We played tough on the road in front of a big crowd and were not intimidated to open this one up. I am not really sure how good Auburn is yet. I still have them pegged as the third best team in the West (behind Bammer and a talent-rich LSU squad).
The two glaring issues offensively for me are up front and at the wide receiver position. We have improved up front but still made mental errors when it counted. Clemson's receivers were less than impressive. To be blunt, we have all heard about the talent that we have here and I expect more consistency out of this group at this point.
This season is far from over after one big game. We can fix some of these items (WR performance is up there) and pray that we stay healthy on the offensive line. Clemson needs to develop depth up front but it does not appear that this will happen this season. We will have to improve as a team. We will need to feed Ellington the football and toss Harper the ball. Dwayne Allen will, as we predicted, need to be featured in this offense until our receivers can become consistent contributors to this team. Our defensive line will need to maintain focus for a full game and avoid fatigue and complacency issues like raising pad levels. Our linebackers will need to overcome some early injuries and provide more proper gap control. Our secondary must grow up but, I feel, will be jam up as we get deeper into conference play. Special teams needs to maintain composure every time the ball is kicked. We cannot afford ANY goofs here.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They also got stonewalled by max protect at times.
Yet Auburn still completed passes with only 2 or 3 in the pattern.
Yeah I don't see how they could've been fatigued in the 3rd quarter.
They only played like 15 snaps in the whole first half.
And speaking of Harper dancing too much, which play was it in the second half (I think) when it was short yardage and I think we had an extra tackle on the right side and they just plowed over the end and instead of following his blockers, harper tried to go off tackle and ran right into a safety or something and didn’t pick up the first down (obviously I haven’t watched nor do I have access to film of the game). I could’ve got the first down on that play. Anybody remember that one? What was the situation there?
It was first half a Power play
Diehl and Cloy led him through the hole and both were on the same LB. Harper spilled out and right into another LB.
He wouldve gotten the 1st down if he followed his blockers.
yeah that sounds like the play
you think the coaches will show him that one on film?
I think this goes back to the discussion of coaching running backs. Bowden used to say you didn’t have to coach running backs and I thought it was obvious that he (or his running back coaches) didn’t. I remember when spiller was a freshman and sophomore on outside running plays and there was a block on the corner he never read the block and cut inside. Instead he would try to run around the guy to the outside even if the blocker was kicking out. He did it countless times and it seemed like to me that could be easily solved by just showing him the film and telling him to read his blockers. I saw less of that once bowden got out of town. hopefully the new regime thinks it’s ok to coach running backs. any thoughts on that?
Imagine what would have happened if Davis and Spiller had been coached
Maybe RBs need less coaching than other positions, but it sounds stupid to me to say they don’t need any.
I’m not a football coach, but I know they have running back coaches in the NFL, many of whom are former runing backs. They must pay these guys for something, and it’s not recruiting.
Behind the line of scrimmage belongs to the coaches
When it comes to RB’s, until they reach the line of scrimmage, the coach should own their time. Once they reach the line of scrimmage, it’s up to the RB’s to use their natural abilities to make things happen. Drives me crazy when RB’s spend too much time behind the line figuring out where to go. Coach them up to the line, then let them do their stuff from there.
They are taught how to read blocks
Particularly on zone plays. It is a pretty miniscule amount of actual practice time in my opinion.
Considering the depth we have on the DL
And the fact that our offense kept the ball so long in the 1st half, I don’t see how fatigue could be a valid excuse for the 3rd quarter play.
If guys get tired, sub them out. We have a quality rotation for the DL. Go to the sideline and get oxygen.
This was complacency/overconfidence combined with schematic adjustments by Auburn that took us (for some reason) an entire quarter to sort out, in my opinion. And that combination cost us the game.
Looking at the play by play, Harper had FAR too many runs for a loss. It is possible that this was random bad luck, and the OL just blew it whenever he happened to be in there, but not likely. We’ve seen this phenomenon from him before.
I feel certain that he and the coaches have taken note of this (a blind bat could have seen it in this game), so hopefully he will be drilling (yet again) on running straight ahead behind the blocks. I wonder if he is not trying to avoid contact because he is concerned about fumbling (he’s had a couple of really high profile fumbles…)
As you noted there are some positive aspect to take from the game as well as negatives, and there is no doubt the team is improved over the past few seasons.
I'm with you.
I thought harper had finally figured this thing out by the way he played in the bowl game and in the first two games of this season. the first two games were against smaller competition. maybe it’s a confidence thing. maybe when he goes up against more physical defenses he resorts to dancing instead of head-bustin. maybe he was intimidated.
With Clemson's woes catching the ball, I also would not mind seeing Harper flexed out to give us more threats in the forward passing area.
In the interview on Tnet, he basically said he liked being motioned out as a receiver. Easier to make guys miss, and smaller guys to deal with.
Those are pretty telling comments – although he is a big guy, he maybe doesn’t want to play like we think a big guy should. So use him at what he is good at.
Maybe he should gain 40 more and be a TE.
Times Like These
It’s times like these when i start digging around the net inquiring into the thoughts of the tiger faithful. Unfortunately, Clemson performs poorly, time and time again, and people take to the web, radio, and news papers to discuss how and why. The answer is not all that complex. The situation not at all new. But to hear the average Clemson fan, whom still lives in the 80’s, tell it; they are dumbfounded as to how Clemson could possibly lose a football game. Honestly, i’m one of the biggest Clemson fans on this earth. I bitch, i moan, i cuss.. hell i even break shit. But in all reality this is what we are. Over-talented, underachieving, unaccomplished tigers. We do not, and will not, mean the slightest to the nation picture until there are drastic changes in Clemson. Starting with TBP. The man is a complete moron and i’ll leave it at that. Barker needs to resign or wake up and realize where he holds the Presidency. Dabo.. great guy. probably will be a great head coach and i’m more than willing to give him the opportunity to win 10 games and the ACC this yr. The tigers proved that they know how to play the game, at least for 3 quarters. But you cant blame the defense for the 3rd quarter seeing as how they were on the field entirely to much. Mostly because of conservative play calling on offense. Which leads me to Napier.. prob will be a great offensive coordinator one day. And i’m willing also to give him the same opportunity as Dabo. Brad and son.. bye. enough said on that topic. well no.. he’s a fat joke of a coach who should have to pay to watch Clemson play, certainly not the other way around. And Son.. who cares. So here’s the question to all the “typical” Clemson fans that don’t mind a 8 win season and an Atlantic division championship… What happens when Clemson does just that.. yet loses to Carolina for 2 years straight for the first time since 69-70? They end up @ the Music City Bowl with an Atlantic Division Championship in the MIGHTY ACC. And we’ve accomplished what? Mediocrity, as usual.. and the cycle continues. Your comments appreciated on the subject.
by charlestontiger on Sep 22, 2010 6:42 PM EDT reply actions
I would say that our fans need to stop and think about the reality.
I do not like what President Barker is doing with the Top 20 innitiative, among other things, but there are probably a lot of things he does that are good which we never hear about because good news is boring.
I am not wild about TDP, and in hindsite think he never should have given TB the extension. However, at the time, we were coming off a pretty successful season and were on the way to one of our best recruiting classes ever, so I can understand why someone would want to maintain the status quo. Horrible decision in hindsite, and many say they “knew” we had made a mistake at the time, but you can’t change the past. I am sure that if we had changed coaches, and then gone on to lose most of those recruits and stink it up in 2008 that there would be people saying they “knew” we should have ponied up the money and kept him. That said, I think Dabo was a good hire, Purnell was a good hire, and Brownell will prove to be a good hire.
I think Dabo is a good coach and will be a great coach when it is all said and done, and will not rest until he gets the program where he wants it, which is where we all want it. Do I want to win every game? Yes. Am I upset when we lose games we could/should win? Yes. But am I realistic enough to understand we are not going to win every game, and that the problems we had under TB cannot be fixed over night? Yes. Bottom line is that I want to see progress, and as long as I feel we are moving in the right direction, then I am going to continue to support the team.
As far as the assistant coaches are concerned…well, some posistions have not faired as well as others, and some assistant coaches do not appear to add much to the equation. That said, I do not think it is a stretch to say that any coach at Clemson (or pretty much any D1 school) knows more about football than 99.9% of those who post comments on the internet. Maybe I do not need to be an expert to know if WR’s are dropping passes or if linemen are missing blocks, but I am also not at all of the practices or all of the coaches meetings, and I do not know as much about the situation as CDS.
There is something in these Hills!
by Tigerplowboy on Sep 27, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought that Napier went too conservative in the 3rd quarter, and cost us the game.
I thought Napier called a good, varied, unpredictable 1st half. But in the 3rd quarter he seemed to get very conservative and predictable, as though he thought that he could grind the clock down for the entire second half with an inside running game. Basically, in each of the first 3 series in the 3rd quarter, Napier predictably ran into the middle of the Auburn defense for little gain on 1st & 2nd downs, and then he predictably and unsuccessfully threw on 3rd-and-long. I think Napier’s change in play calling was largely responsible for Clemson losing the game. After Auburn took the lead, Napier went back to a more balanced attack, which led to Clemson’s tying TD.
This play-calling psychology seems really common in college football. One team pulls comfortably ahead and then gets conservative which lets the other team back in the game. I think that the better OC won that game. I hope Napier learned that you can’t take your foot off the throat and you gotta go with what’s working, not with what you want to work.
I Agree BUT
All plays run through Dabo. so who really to blame? i mean honestly who would go conservative against a potentially explosive offense such as Auburn. Certainly not i. Clearly i have more sense than those 2.
by charlestontiger on Sep 22, 2010 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
















