Clemson and Auburn Recruiting Comparison

 
It is important to understand and realize that recruiting is one of the most critical portions of winning (or losing) football games.  This week we will get an idea of the talent on both Clemson's and Auburn's squads based solely on data pulled from Rivals and Scout.

Below, we show in Figure 1 the average annual star rankings for both squads.  Both teams give you what you would expect out of decent football schools...an average ranking that is over 3 stars and five year average exceeding 3.2 stars.  Clemson's numbers are a little skewed by the 2009 class that was extremely small but contained some extremely talented players.  What does this tell us?  The average player recruited by either school has above average talent.  Clemson may have a slight advantage from an "average player's talent" level based on these numbers but that advantage appears to be pretty small.  (more after the jump)

Clemson_auburn_recruiting_star_ranking_medium

Figure 1:  Clemson and Auburn Yearly Average Star Ratings

Figure 2, shown below, examines the class sizes of the past five recruiting classes for each school.  Notice that Auburn's class sizes were considerably larger than Clemson's.  While it is impossible to know how many of these players actually enrolled as Freshmen, there is a definite advantage in Auburn recruiting and signing more players.  Since we decided from the data in Figure 1 that both schools recruit comparable, above-average talent, the extra numbers provide Auburn both a better probability of players who live up to/exceed their talent rating AND more quality depth.  From a numbers basis, Auburn appears to have a sizable advantage over Clemson's Tigers. 


Clemson_auburn_recruiting_class_size_medium

Figure 2:  Class Size per Team

As expected from the data above and shown below in Figure 3, Auburn was consistently ranked higher than Clemson in the average Rivals/Scout overall yearly rankings.  Clemson did have the outlier year (2009) but really did not have a jam up class in this five year period save the 2008 class.  Auburn on the other hand scored top ten classes in 3 out of the last 5 recruiting years.  Subsequently, Clemson's average ranking over the past five years rests between 20th and 25th in the nation while Auburn sits averages a 11-12 ranking annually.

Clemson_auburn_recruiting_ntl_rankings_medium

Figure 3:  Annual National Recruiting Rankings

What do these numbers really mean?  These data show both teams recruiting quality players on average.  Auburn, however, has been able to sign more of these players annually.  More quality players equates to a better overall ranking.  More quality players should give Auburn an advantage with more quality backups AND quality Scout team players in practice.  Thus, Auburn should be able to get deeper game rotations and, because of the more athletic practice squad, gets a better look as it prepares during the week for its games on Saturdays.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Shakin The Southland

You must be a member of Shakin The Southland to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Shakin The Southland. You should read them.

Join Shakin The Southland

You must be a member of Shakin The Southland to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Shakin The Southland. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker