Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin Continues Rampage, New York Wins On Road

Sawchik talks with The Man

Photo

Danny Ford never shied away from hard work. When The Post and Courier's Travis Sawchik reached him recently, the former Clemson football coach was underneath his lawnmower making a repair. Ford remains the youngest football coach to win a national title, leading the Tigers to their only national championship as a 34-year-old at the 1982 Orange Bowl. His 11-year run at Clemson, which included a 96-29-4 overall record, is considered a golden era of Clemson football.

Clemson is coming off its first Atlantic Division title with a young head coach. What is the most difficult part of maintaining success?

"The more you win, the more people want to try and beat you. That would be the main thing. You have to be able to handle the challenges presented to you when people think you are the best team in the league."

Dabo Swinney recently talked about some of his learning experiences during his first 21 games. What were some of your early learning experiences?

"It wasn't real hard those first years because we had a lot of players back. It's never hard until you lose, that's when it gets hard -- when you get to losing and trying to turn it back around. The hardest thing in the world, which I don't think either of us has had to do (at Clemson) -- we had to do it at Arkansas -- is convince people they can win when they are getting beat so bad, and build confidence in them. The only way to do that is to win and it just takes time. If you don't have the players you have to get the players."

What made you successful as a coach?

"I think the best thing we did was work. Hard work. We believed in being physical. That was something we were taught growing up. That was something we were taught playing ball. That you could out-work people, that you could out-hit people. I don't believe I ever lost that. … I've had coaches come and say we are working them too hard, we are doing this too much and we need to back off. That just wasn't what we were going to do. We knew we had a system that would work. … If I was coaching today, I wouldn't change."

Clemson sports information director Tim Bourret feels you didn't get credit for your in-game adjustments. What are some elements of coaching, whether it be game management or something else, you felt you didn't get credit for?

"I got plenty of credit, more so than I deserved. I never worried about that. My coaches did all the work and my players did all the playing. All I was really responsible for was getting them to the game on Saturday. The coaches have the game plan. All I wanted to do is make sure we followed their plan and that we had tough enough practice during the week that the ball game was easy."

What would it take for Clemson to win another national title?

"I don't know that Clemson will ever win another national championship. I don't know that we would have won another national championship. They are just so hard to win. We had good players, and good games and good luck, too. … That is a long way off for Clemson at this particular time. What they need to do is -- they did a pretty good job of it last year -- they need to learn how to win at home. They need to learn how to win on the road and win the conference championship. That would put them back to where they would be a top-10 football team every year. It's out of reach until they become a consistent winner and (contend) for a conference championship every year. … (Clemson) doesn't have a resource problem. They have as good of facilities as anyone in the country. They have great support. They have a lot of things people don't have. They just need to recruit very well, develop football players, and learn to win."

What's changed the most about the game?

"I guess just the time limits and limiting practices. I think they have three two-a-days this year and I think we would always have six or seven."

If you were commissioner of college football for a day, what would you change?

"You don't have time and I don't either … I just hope they don't water down the product, the product of teaching the players and spending the time with them you need to develop them and stuff like that. You can't work too hard."

What are your thoughts on the job Swinney has done thus far?

"They've done a nice job. The only thing about a football coach or basketball coach -- what's the last thing you've done? The last thing they've done is win a bowl game so they are on a positive note. They get beat by Presbyterian (Sept. 11), that would be a helluva bad note. That's what you have to guard against -- not having too many bad notes. Just don't lose. It's all about winning."

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think the authors of this site would get along with this Danny Ford guy really well! Work hard and do you job correctly and you will be good at what you do. I wish everyone in America had this attitude. The Bear would be proud.

Clemson Sports Analysis and Insight
www.shakinthesouthland.com

by FIGUREFOUR on Aug 8, 2010 10:11 PM EDT reply actions  

So Danny does not think we can win another National Championship?

I agree you have to be a consistent 10-game winner to have a realistic chance, but I also think we could be a consistent 10-game winner. Not wild about that comment, but I agree with the other things he said.

There is something in these Hills!

by Tigerplowboy on Aug 9, 2010 9:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Ford has a point...

Unless the stars unnaturally align, teams that aren’t consistently winning 10 games per year, recruiting top-five classes each year, etc., aren’t winning national titles. You have to be good enough to blitz through the season with only a few challenges, and when those come around, you have to hope you’re still a step faster and that you get a couple of breaks. The teams that are in that group right now are Alabama, Florida, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Texas, maybe a few others. You’ve gotta be really, really good. Clemson has been a solid program over the past few seasons, but it’s not on that level. It was there under Ford, but that was a brief, anomalous period in its history. This isn’t to say it can’t get back there, but it’s a long climb between being a consistently good team and a consistently great team. But I’ll have to admit that Dabo is off to a good start. He got you to the ACCCG in his first year and is tearing it up on the recruiting trail. That’s a good start.

I have a similar conversation often with some of my more optimistic USC friends. A lot of Gamecocks fans look at every season and say, “Hey! We’re winning some games, recruiting well, not getting blown out by Florida, etc.” The problem is that it’s still a long way to the top. So what if we’re as close as we’ve ever been to Florida? I counted the other day and they had something like 20 five-star prospects on their roster to our 2. Those top handful of programs are just monstrously good, and that’s the kind of talent it takes to compete for the MNC.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Aug 10, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That brief, anomalous period was an entire decade.

If VT can put themselves consistently in the 10-win range, then Clemson and South Carolina can both do the same. Just a matter of coaching and talent acquisition and development.

by OrangeBritches on Aug 11, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is kind of what I said, but I agree with you.

It is hard to get from 8 win seasons to 10 win seasons, and even then, it is hard to break into that top group. UGA and VT are perfect examples of really successful programs that are not really in the conversation for the national title, even though they have had a lot of success in recent years. I freely admit we have a ways to go before we get to that level, but I do take exception to someone saying we will never win one again. That is like people saying USC will never win the SEC. Sure it does not look very likely this season or next season, but saying it will never happen is just ridiculous.

I also do not buy the recruiting rankings as much as a lot of people…Southern Cal, Miami, and FSU have all had really highly rated classes for years and years but none of them were close to a NC last year. Southern Cal is really the best example because they have had the top rated class a few times over the past several years, and still got waxed by Oregon, Oregon State, Stanford, and Washington over the past several years. Just goes to show you have to have more than 5-star players to win.

There is something in these Hills!

by Tigerplowboy on Aug 11, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough. I was probably straining the difference in opinion.

And I would agree that Clemson can get there again.

Garnet and Black Attack: A Blog by and for Gamecocks Fans.

by Gamecock Man on Aug 11, 2010 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Miami recruiting hasn't been as good as everyone thinks

i think they have like an average rank (rivals) of like 13 or 14 in the last 4 or 5 year and only cracking the top 10 once in 08. FSU has no excuse in that category top 10 like 3 of the last 4years. SoCal has been an elite program for the entire decade i wouldn’t use them as an example.

by Tigershine88 on Aug 12, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you see Southern Cal play last year?

They, and all of their 5-star players ended up in the Emerald Bowl against BC, and BC played them a heck of a game. Also, they play in a weak conference, yet have not been in the national title game since what, 2004? That may be a high standard, but they should have been there more with their talent and their schedule. IMO, they and FSU are the posterboys for underachievers in college football.

You may be right about Miami, even though they signed a pretty good class in 2008. Let’s just hope they don’t put it all together until after October 2.

There is something in these Hills!

by Tigerplowboy on Aug 13, 2010 4:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation site about the Clemson Tigers. If you want to take a hard look at both sides of something, feel free to stick around and comment. Be forewarned, we don't pump sunshine here.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img2_small
Hurry Up Defense (part 3)

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help me understand this site's setup...
Small
ACC Announces: Syracuse to Atlantic - Pitt to Coastal
Img2_small
Hurry Up Defense (part 5)
Img2_small
Hurry Up Defense (Part 4)
Small
My Personal Experience with Batson's S&C Program
Img2_small
Hurry Up Defense (Part2)
Img2_small
Hurry Up Defense (Part 1)
Mavs_2011_champions_wallpaper_by_angelmaker666-d3ix5pg_small
Brent Veneables staying in Clemson
Squat_small
Want to know the difference between Clemson's Defense and Alabama's?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Bengal Tiger

Danny_ford_small DrB

Slick_small FIGUREFOUR

Persian Tiger

Tyree_helmet_catch_small ggggmen08

Sma_20clemson-tiger-w_20_2__small redbricktiger

Sumatran Tiger

Ellington_small Peter_G

Cj_spiller_heisman_small F1NS