Pre-Film Thoughts and Assessment
Yesterday was yet another strange day in college football and a strange day for the Clemson Tigers. Somehow, I guess by dumb luck and by virtue of playing in the ACC Atlantic, this team is a three loss team that is still in the hunt (you could probably say driver's or pretty close seat, because we anticipate a Maryland capitulation before it is all said and done and I could easily see NC State losing another game down the stretch) to repeat as the Atlantic Division representative in the ACCCG this season. All of this is happening while Clemson seems to be regressing as a whole on the field. We will go ahead and thank the defense for another good effort and leave the rest for discussion after the jump.
Somebody should have told me the dang circus was in town because I didn't see the freaking tents.
I chattet with Dr. B yesterday (he was away from the internet machine) and he confirmed that your speculations were on spot, as yesterday's game was particularly difficult to watch and digest.
I don't think this offensive staff is going to get a favorable review this week from the good Dr. and they sure as all hell get the "pack your shit and get out of town" vote from me. I guess we saw tears of relief, as Swinney went from a fan-scathing press conference explaining the loss to, well, probably a fan-scathing presser explaining how our staff and team are the greatest group of people in the ultraverse and they deserve more respect and people out there don't know anything about _____ (you fill in what you don't know).
Overall and outside of the first quarter (and first series in particular), Clemson's defense was lights out yesterday. The team got critical stops all afternoon especially when our offense put them in a tough situation because of a turnover. Clemson, sans, the opening drive for the Pack, was able to keep Russell Wilson and a pretty dangerous offense out of the endzone for the final three quarters of the football game. The defense won the game yesterday and Clemson was VERY, VERY fortunate that the defense came to play and that NC State could not capitalize on very opportune situations during the game.
On to the bad pathetic unacceptable and vomit inducing portion of the football game. Our offense flat out sucks, as does the majority of our special teams. I guess I'll get on special teams first, as it almost cost us the game yesterday then get on our offense because it should have cost us the game against NC State.
Why in the hell do we have three, yes three field goal kickers on staff and none of them can put the ball through the uprights? Yes I know that Richard Jackson allegedly kicked the ball from Greenwood all the way to Columbia once in high school but I really don't give a shit if he cannot make a 30 yard kick. Our scholarship allocation has been a touchy subject around here and if you include our special teams "specialists" we waste a lot of scholarships on players who probably should not be in a Division 1 football game.
Another special teams "specialist" who almost cost us the game was long snapper Matt Skinner. I don't know why we have a player on scholarship who does nothing but long snap, but don't care if he is jam up there and we don't have A SINGLE bad snap on the year. If we have ANY bad snaps, this is a misallocated scholarship as we could get another lineman or a linebacker to snap and occasionally screw something up (although there is no excuse). Skinner had two bad snaps yesterday...the first missed field goal then the punt near the end of the game. We are lucky that we have a punter (Dawson Zimmerman) with the athletic ability of an early ‘90's Ken Griffey Jr. to retrieve bad snaps and avoid complete disaster for this team.
FINALLY, I am tired of seeing our return men fumbling the football on returns. The bad thing about our fumbles is they have been unforced errors (ie, non-contact blunders). We cannot seem to cleanly field a kick then run during kickoffs. I will say that Marcus Gilchrist had a very nice (76 yard) kick return in the early part of the 4th quarter. I am only sorry that our offense completely pissed away this opportunity, as we will discuss below.
Clemson's offense is, well, offensive to watch. We have a QB who showed that he can sit in the pocket and throw well. Just when you get more comfortable with him tossing the ball, Kyle Parker starts throwing the ball across his body and makes critical mistakes. Our QB situation is frustrating to say the least. We did, however, get a pretty good idea of where the staff thinks we are personnel wise as Kyle Parker had all of the pass attempts (by one of our quarterbacks) on the afternoon. Maybe KP just needs to quit scrambling or trying to throw the ball after scrambling, I don't know.
We simply make way too many mistakes on offense to win football games. We had a stupid interception and put the ball on the ground a couple of times. These are things that our anemic (probably a nice way to describe it) offense is not good enough to overcome these mistakes. The most frustrating part about these turnovers was where they occurred. Kyle Parker's interception occurred deep in NC State territory. Assuming we figure out how to kick a reasonable field goal, that is the equivalent of giving up three points. On a side note, said error ALMOST lost us the football game as a block in the back was the only reason NC State didn't turn this error into six points. Another key error occurred deep in our own territory. Clemson does something good (blocked a kick) in the second quarter then Tajh Boyd cannot get the handoff to Jamie Harper, giving NC State the ball again deep in our territory. I know Boyd hasn't played much to date, but we cannot have these mistakes in such critical areas of the game and in critical areas of the football field.
That is one issue. We still have a play calling issue. 260 yards total offense (this number includes 21 negative yards accumulated by Parker) is unacceptable. I know we have a lot of specific issues but 260 yards total offense? 14 offensive points, seven of them coming on an extremely short field set up after your defense forced a fumble is not acceptable and the blame must start with the man who is orchestrating this thing, at least in title. After watching yesterday's performance, I don't think I would end the blame with him and would vote to fire the ENTIRE offensive staff (even, I hate to say it, Danny Pearman because of guilt by association). Let's look at this thing position by position:
Jeff Scott: We finally have better personnel on the field but are still dropping balls and had a fumble by a WR this week. The silver lining is that we are getting our younger guys into games and they are outperforming the veterans (seniors). The other side is that we still drop balls and this unit falls short.
Andre Powell: His comments a few weeks ago when comparing Ellington to Harper absolutely sealed the deal for me. We already told you that Powell should have been replaced after last season and results from this year further solidify those views.
Brad Scott: Did you watch our offensive line yesterday? Pathetic. NC State completely shut down our running game and were getting great pressure on passing downs. They simply whipped us all over the place, limiting Clemson to 260 total yards on the afternoon. We all saw McClain and Walker get rolled over all day against the Pack. The worst part about this whole offensive line fiasco is that we have developed little quality talent behind our starters (I would substitute the word "no" for little but that wouldn't be accurate as Mason Cloy has given the Tigers quality snaps during his career). This is squarely a Brad Scott issue and unfortunately he brings Danny Pearman down with him simply based on results to date.
Billy Napier: Billy is (by title) in charge of this whole thing. How much of this offense is really his is up for debate, but he is the offensive coordinator and by default is the man responsible for making this thing go. Thus, he gets the praise if we put up 60 and the criticism when we play like we have this season.
We are where we are and, save some miraculous run to end the season, these guys will deservedly be under pressure when the season ends. Whatever the reason (poor practice methodology, a clash in philosophy between the head coach/offensive coordinator, bad formations, poor personnel groupings, etc...), we suck on offense and need adjustments as this thing isn't fixing itself.
In short, Dabo and the offensive portion of the staff should be buying the defensive folks a few dinners for saving their asses again this week. I am happy that we are able to play decent defense for the most part but am, like most of you out there, tired of our offense and kick teams being a liability for Clemson's football program.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
With the possible exception of our Defense
you cannot convince me that we are a well coached and focused team. The dumb penalties and turnovers are clear indications of that. It is a miracle that our defense is as good as it is considering the fact that our LBs are a liability in pass coverage. Obviously, winning is the most important outcome of a football game, but I do not have any more confidence in our team now than I would if we would have lost. I feel sorry for our defensive staff and players. They need some help.
I am amazed they amassed more than 200 yards
with their predictability.
QB under center means run or WR flare.
Gun means pass.
My untrained eye can even see this. Why anyone plays zone against us is incomprehensible. I know BS sucks but the predictability of our playcalling has to be affecting OL play.
I blame Matt Skinner
for the collective failure of our kickers. There is absolutely NO way that we have 3 kickers on scholarship and they’re all this bad. The common factors are Matt Skinner and Michael Wade as holder, with the most likely issue being Skinner. Please tell me he’s graduating? I feel like he’s been here for 5 or 6 years
Thank Tom O'Brien for the win
Why he decided to punt the ball on 4th and 1 from our 43 with ~4 minutes left is beyond belief.
into the boundary
When doing the film review I would like some insight as to why we run plays that are designed to hit the edge into the boundary. The screens and sweeps primarily. I know you cant always go to the wide side, but why do we go short side so much.
WIDE ASS OPEN
I will look at that for you.
But the primary reason I can tell you already, its because the defense puts more numbers on the Field side. Plays go into the boundary so you can have a numbers advantage on the point of attack.
I can hear T Bowden’s voice in the back of my head “Defense wins championships”. Any chance our offense can turn it around enough and our defense carry us to basically 1 1/2 more conference games?
Even though I don’t think he is entirely problem, part of me wants to see Billy Napier fired so we finally get to the bottom of the Dabo playcall debate. You know that when Napier is let go he will not hold back on what was happening here. We will finally see how much Dabo was messing with the offense…
I hate to see Clemson lose more than anything but I do not want to see a miracle run to Charlotte that will make Dabo seem like a savior and TDP a genius. I’ll take the Mee Maw’s Cole Slaw Bowl and Dabo on a hot hot hot seat instead…
Miracle Run
I don’t think even a miracle run at this point will stop at least some amount of staff turnover from being demanded by the fans at the end of the season. I think you’ll see Napier gone because that’s how Dabo can cover his own ass, and at that point hopefully an experienced coordinator will be hired that either Dabo will be scared to override, or won’t give a shit what Dabo says and will run his offense regardless.
by PenthouseTiger on Nov 7, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions
Billy Napier flat out sucks. Dabo should be fired for even considering giving him the OC job
I really wish Dabo would man up, admit he has no clue as to what the fuck he is doing, and then say goodbye. PLEASE DABO, JUST GO AWAY!!!
Agreed
It’ll never happen in a million years but wouldn’t it be awesome if Dabo called a presser right after the Carolina game which we’ll probably lose and say “Folks, I just gotta be honest here. I couldn’t hardly BELIEVE that they gave ME, a marginal wide receiver coach and former real estate salesman, the head coaching job at Clemson!!! Heck, everybody knows the only reason I was promoted to Asst.HC under Tommy was because I somehow convinced CJ Spiller to come here and Saban was about to steal me away to ‘bama so they offered some more money and a title. But I gotta tell ya’ll, I’m in over my dadgum head!! I can’t sleep at night!! I can’t take this pressure! That crazy 5% of the fanbase is making my life a living heck!! Shucks, I think I’m ‘gon go be OC at Valdosta State or something. Use the rest of my contract money to pay Gary Patterson…I’m all OUT!”
by veryveryproud on Nov 7, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions
Who would have thought
Jacoby Ford has a 100 yard game
Michael Palmer scores his first nfl td
Both are having a bigger impact than CJ
That probably speaks to just how god awful the bills are
That's easy...
The Bills do exactly what Clemson has done all year. They don’t play the best guy. CJ only has 30 carries on the season. Some guys get that in 1 game.
Way it looks now, TDP is working on another big extension
with a big buyout if he wins a couple more games. Watch and see.
TDP’s interview with LW the other day made me want to vomit, this man is completely out of touch with reality. He’ll give Dabo a contract with a 4M buyout clause like he gave Tommy.
I seriously hope you are joking. If dabo gets a contract extension after this season
heads need to roll. Dabo should be fired upon the completion of the USuC game.
TDP won't fire Dabo and Dabo won't fire Napier because Napier might then tell the truth.
I just don’t see Dabo firing his buddy, Napier any more than I saw Tommy Bowden firing his buddy, Rob Spence. 1) Dabo is too nice of a guy. 2) A fired Napier might be angry enough to tell everyone the truth about how much Dabo has been meddling in the play-calling and personnel decisions. That would be bad for Dabo and TDP.
but that is exactly what I want...
When Napier spills all Dabo will be in even more trouble than he already is…
by Clemson Caniac on Nov 8, 2010 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
Napier will not
be critical of Dabo. I am sure that Dabo would agree that Offense has been offensive. Coaching has looked bad but players still have to perform. Kickers have been terrible and receivers can’t catch. Parker has looked like a freshman who didn’t go through preseason practice. I don’t blame Dabo for all of this. I think that Dabo in hindsight would have cleaned house when he was hired. I think he will make big changes with staff this year; including Napier, Powell and little Scott. Still may win Atlantic (hard to believe); mainly because Clemson has more talent than the other teams, and that can win you some games despite terrible offensive game plan every week since AU. Apparently FSU has it’s problems as well.
You dont think Napier will tell all?
There has been enough controversy about Dabo sticking his hands in the play calling pot. Napier is the I formation guy and we have a team designed to run the ball yet we operate out of the spread. They fought at practice last year. Why do you feel Napier would not let the people know Dabo was overruling him on the play calling responsibilities?
by Clemson Caniac on Nov 8, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions
Correct, Napier wont say anything
if he does, it would amount to professional suicide. The way it’ll be done is by sly comments here and there, he’ll never come out and say he was overruled time and again.
by DrB on Nov 8, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
I hear from a Clemson insider ,
that " I’m one of the 5% " buttons are being sold in mass quantities around the upstate , and that billboards are going up also about getting rid of the staff . Sounds like things “may” be coming to fruition !!! Time will tell , but heads may start rolling………especially after what UsUCK does to us in a few weeks . I would love a whole new staff , but Terry and Barker have to go for there to be REAL change in Tiger Town .
Fingers crossed……..( as they have been for 20 years )
Bill Smith is reacting to the mass emails and letters
The BOT is going to get involved, how much is unclear.
by DrB on Nov 8, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
Someone should start (if they havent already)
a group that’s entitled “the 5%”
And see how many people we can get
I am original 5%'er. I was totally against hiring Dabo in the first place. I wanted a total
staff overhaul; a fresh start. I would have killed to get Patterson.
Let me also clarify that I was against hiring Dabo, but I hoped he'd prove me wrong
If I was wrong that’d have meant that Clemson had a lot of success.
But in all reality, he went 4-3 in 2008. Did anyone really expect that he’d be any different that Tommy B?? Fire one 8-4, 7-5 coach and hire a 4-3 coach with even less experience??

by 


















